back to index

Dr. Erich Jarvis: The Neuroscience of Speech, Language & Music | Huberman Lab Podcast #87



link |
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,
link |
00:00:02.260
where we discuss science and science-based tools
link |
00:00:04.900
for everyday life.
link |
00:00:09.140
I'm Andrew Huberman,
link |
00:00:10.180
and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology
link |
00:00:13.180
at Stanford School of Medicine.
link |
00:00:15.100
Today, my guest is Dr. Eric Jarvis.
link |
00:00:17.740
Dr. Jarvis is a professor at the Rockefeller University
link |
00:00:20.500
in New York City, and his laboratory studies
link |
00:00:23.580
the neurobiology of vocal learning, language,
link |
00:00:26.680
speech disorders, and remarkably,
link |
00:00:29.020
the relationship between language, music, and movement,
link |
00:00:32.620
in particular, dance.
link |
00:00:34.500
His work spans from genomics,
link |
00:00:37.180
so the very genes that make up our genome,
link |
00:00:40.860
and the genomes of other species
link |
00:00:42.700
that speak and have language,
link |
00:00:44.280
such as songbirds and parrots,
link |
00:00:46.840
all the way up to neural circuits,
link |
00:00:48.420
that is the connections in the brain and body
link |
00:00:50.700
that govern our ability to learn and generate
link |
00:00:53.180
specific sounds and movements coordinated with those sounds,
link |
00:00:56.220
including hand movements,
link |
00:00:58.180
and all the way up to cognition,
link |
00:01:01.300
that is our ability to think in specific ways
link |
00:01:04.040
based on what we are saying
link |
00:01:05.540
and the way that we comprehend
link |
00:01:07.340
what other people are saying, singing, and doing.
link |
00:01:10.860
As you'll soon see, I was immediately transfixed
link |
00:01:14.680
and absolutely enchanted by Dr. Jarvis's description
link |
00:01:18.020
of his work and the ways that it impacts
link |
00:01:20.300
all the various aspects of our lives.
link |
00:01:22.540
For instance, I learned from Dr. Jarvis that as we read,
link |
00:01:26.300
we are generating very low levels
link |
00:01:28.660
of motor activity in our throat.
link |
00:01:30.940
That is, we are speaking the words that we are reading
link |
00:01:34.380
at a level below the perception of sound
link |
00:01:36.940
or our own perception of those words,
link |
00:01:39.300
but if one were to put an amplifier
link |
00:01:40.900
or to measure the firing of those muscles
link |
00:01:43.940
in our vocal cords,
link |
00:01:45.220
we'd find that as we're reading information,
link |
00:01:47.260
we are actually speaking that information.
link |
00:01:49.860
And as I learned and you'll soon learn,
link |
00:01:51.860
there's a direct link between those species in the world
link |
00:01:55.060
that have song and movement,
link |
00:01:57.400
which many of us would associate with dance,
link |
00:01:59.500
and our ability to learn and generate complex language.
link |
00:02:03.500
So for people with speech disorders like stutter
link |
00:02:06.540
or for people who are interested
link |
00:02:07.860
in multiple language learning,
link |
00:02:09.900
bilingual, trilingual, et cetera,
link |
00:02:11.940
and frankly, for anyone who is interested
link |
00:02:14.340
in how we communicate through words written or spoken,
link |
00:02:18.060
I'm certain today's episode is going to be
link |
00:02:19.780
an especially interesting and important one for you.
link |
00:02:22.660
Dr. Jarvis's work is so pioneering
link |
00:02:24.800
that he has been awarded truly countless awards.
link |
00:02:27.220
I'm not going to take our time
link |
00:02:28.460
to list off all the various important awards
link |
00:02:30.980
that he's received,
link |
00:02:32.180
but I should point out that in addition
link |
00:02:33.780
to being a decorated professor
link |
00:02:35.780
at the Rockefeller University,
link |
00:02:37.240
he is also an investigator
link |
00:02:38.420
with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
link |
00:02:40.160
the so-called HHMI.
link |
00:02:42.260
And for those of you that don't know,
link |
00:02:43.820
HHMI investigators are selected
link |
00:02:46.340
on an extremely competitive basis
link |
00:02:49.060
that they have to re-up,
link |
00:02:50.620
that is they have to re-compete every five years.
link |
00:02:53.120
They actually receive a grade every five years
link |
00:02:56.060
that dictates whether or not
link |
00:02:57.280
they are no longer a Howard Hughes investigator,
link |
00:02:59.940
whether or not they can advance
link |
00:03:01.300
to another five years of funding
link |
00:03:03.920
for their important research.
link |
00:03:05.400
And indeed, Howard Hughes investigators are selected
link |
00:03:07.820
not just for the rigor of their work,
link |
00:03:09.620
but for their pioneering spirit
link |
00:03:11.200
and their ability to take on high risk,
link |
00:03:13.460
high benefit work,
link |
00:03:15.460
which is exactly the kind of work
link |
00:03:16.740
that Dr. Jarvis has been providing for decades now.
link |
00:03:20.100
Again, I think today's episode
link |
00:03:21.560
is one of the more unique and special episodes
link |
00:03:23.500
that we've had on the Huberman Lab Podcast.
link |
00:03:25.140
I single it out because it really spans
link |
00:03:27.680
from the basic to the applied.
link |
00:03:29.500
And Dr. Jarvis's story is an especially unique one
link |
00:03:32.140
in terms of how he arrived at becoming a neurobiologist.
link |
00:03:35.060
So for those of you that are interested
link |
00:03:36.620
in personal journey and personal story,
link |
00:03:38.800
Dr. Jarvis's is truly a special and important one.
link |
00:03:42.700
I'm pleased to announce that the Huberman Lab Podcast
link |
00:03:44.580
is now partnered with Momentous Supplements.
link |
00:03:46.900
We partnered with Momentous for several important reasons.
link |
00:03:49.140
First of all, they ship internationally
link |
00:03:50.820
because we know that many of you
link |
00:03:52.180
are located outside of the United States.
link |
00:03:54.240
Second of all, and perhaps most important,
link |
00:03:56.260
the quality of their supplements is second to none,
link |
00:03:58.800
both in terms of purity and precision
link |
00:04:00.480
of the amounts of the ingredients.
link |
00:04:02.420
Third, we've really emphasized supplements
link |
00:04:05.060
that are single ingredient supplements
link |
00:04:07.260
and that are supplied in dosages
link |
00:04:09.300
that allow you to build a supplementation protocol
link |
00:04:12.280
that's optimized for cost,
link |
00:04:14.100
that's optimized for effectiveness,
link |
00:04:15.980
and that you can add things and remove things
link |
00:04:18.140
from your protocol in a way
link |
00:04:19.460
that's really systematic and scientific.
link |
00:04:21.260
If you'd like to see the supplements
link |
00:04:22.420
that we partner with Momentous on,
link |
00:04:23.760
you can go to livemomentous.com slash Huberman.
link |
00:04:26.860
There you'll see those supplements,
link |
00:04:27.980
and just keep in mind that we are constantly expanding
link |
00:04:30.460
the library of supplements available through Momentous
link |
00:04:33.140
on a regular basis.
link |
00:04:34.100
Again, that's livemomentous.com slash Huberman.
link |
00:04:36.640
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast
link |
00:04:39.020
is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford.
link |
00:04:41.700
It is, however, part of my desire and effort
link |
00:04:43.500
to bring zero cost and consumer information about science
link |
00:04:46.060
and science-related tools to the general public.
link |
00:04:48.660
In keeping with that theme,
link |
00:04:49.660
I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast.
link |
00:04:52.360
Our first sponsor is Inside Tracker.
link |
00:04:54.580
Inside Tracker is a personalized nutrition platform
link |
00:04:56.900
that analyzes data from your blood and DNA
link |
00:04:59.380
to help you better meet your immediate
link |
00:05:00.860
and long-term health goals.
link |
00:05:02.460
I've long been a believer in getting regular blood work done
link |
00:05:05.180
for the simple reason that many of the factors
link |
00:05:07.380
that impact your immediate and long-term health
link |
00:05:09.220
can only be analyzed from a quality blood test.
link |
00:05:12.020
And nowadays with the advent of modern DNA tests,
link |
00:05:14.220
you can also get insight into, for example,
link |
00:05:16.100
what your biological age is
link |
00:05:17.480
and compare that to your chronological age.
link |
00:05:19.440
The problem with a lot of DNA tests and blood tests,
link |
00:05:22.180
however, is you get information back
link |
00:05:23.940
about metabolic factors, lipids, and hormones and so forth,
link |
00:05:27.440
but you don't know what to do
link |
00:05:28.860
with or about that information.
link |
00:05:30.780
Inside Tracker solves that problem with a simple platform
link |
00:05:33.540
that allows you to click on any specific factor,
link |
00:05:36.140
learn more about it and what it does in your brain and body,
link |
00:05:38.700
and also the various nutritional supplementation
link |
00:05:41.380
and other types of interventions you can take
link |
00:05:43.380
to bring the levels of that factor
link |
00:05:45.420
into the ranges that are optimal for you and your health.
link |
00:05:49.060
If you'd like to try Inside Tracker,
link |
00:05:50.440
you can go to insidetracker.com slash Huberman
link |
00:05:53.180
to get 20% off any of Inside Tracker's plans.
link |
00:05:55.940
That's insidetracker.com slash Huberman to get 20% off.
link |
00:05:59.700
Today's episode is also brought to us by Roca.
link |
00:06:02.060
Roca makes eyeglasses and sunglasses
link |
00:06:04.020
that are of the absolute highest quality.
link |
00:06:05.900
They also have some really unique features
link |
00:06:07.920
that make them especially attractive
link |
00:06:10.100
from the standpoint of aesthetics and performance.
link |
00:06:13.380
The company was founded by two all-American swimmers
link |
00:06:15.380
from Stanford and everything about their eyeglasses
link |
00:06:17.300
and sunglasses were designed with performance in mind.
link |
00:06:19.940
Initially, the eyeglasses and sunglasses
link |
00:06:21.720
were designed for sport,
link |
00:06:22.760
that is for running and for cycling, et cetera.
link |
00:06:24.780
And indeed, still their eyeglasses and sunglasses
link |
00:06:27.180
are very lightweight and they won't slip off your face
link |
00:06:29.180
if you get sweaty, but they also have a terrific aesthetic.
link |
00:06:32.120
You can wear them to work, you can wear them out to eat.
link |
00:06:34.740
I wear readers at night when I work or if I drive
link |
00:06:37.900
and I wear sunglasses sometimes
link |
00:06:39.380
during the middle of the day,
link |
00:06:40.660
if it's too bright and I need sunglasses in order to see.
link |
00:06:43.380
If you'd like to try Roca eyeglasses or sunglasses,
link |
00:06:46.020
you can go to Roca, that's R-O-K-A.com
link |
00:06:48.540
and enter the code Huberman to save 20% off your first order.
link |
00:06:51.620
Again, that's R-O-K-A.com
link |
00:06:53.420
and enter the code Huberman at checkout.
link |
00:06:55.600
Today's episode is also brought to us by Element.
link |
00:06:58.260
Element is an electrolyte drink
link |
00:06:59.860
that has everything you need and nothing you don't,
link |
00:07:02.500
meaning no sugar, but plenty of the correct ratios
link |
00:07:07.140
of sodium, magnesium, and potassium.
link |
00:07:09.760
And those three electrolytes, sodium, magnesium, and potassium
link |
00:07:12.580
are critical for your neuron, your nerve cell function,
link |
00:07:15.060
and for the function of all the cells
link |
00:07:16.900
in your brain and body.
link |
00:07:18.580
I've mentioned this before on the podcast,
link |
00:07:20.520
but I'm a fan of salt, not taking too much salt,
link |
00:07:24.020
but certainly not getting too little salt.
link |
00:07:26.320
Element has 1000 milligrams, that is one gram of salt,
link |
00:07:29.180
which might sound like a lot of salt, but for many people,
link |
00:07:31.420
especially people who are following low carbohydrate diets
link |
00:07:34.220
or who are exercising or sweating a lot or both,
link |
00:07:37.700
that level of salt can actually help you
link |
00:07:39.940
in many circumstances.
link |
00:07:41.100
Getting the appropriate level of salt,
link |
00:07:42.540
and certainly the appropriate levels of electrolytes
link |
00:07:44.260
will improve your cognitive function
link |
00:07:45.740
and will improve your physical performance.
link |
00:07:48.180
If you'd like to try Element, you can go to Drink Element,
link |
00:07:50.660
that's lmnt.com slash Huberman,
link |
00:07:53.260
and you'll get a free sample pack with your order.
link |
00:07:55.540
That's drinklmnt.com slash Huberman.
link |
00:07:58.980
And now for my discussion with Dr. Eric Jarvis.
link |
00:08:02.380
Eric, so great to have you here.
link |
00:08:04.100
Thank you.
link |
00:08:05.380
Very interested in learning from you
link |
00:08:07.240
about speech and language, and even as I asked the question,
link |
00:08:12.020
I realized that a lot of people, including myself,
link |
00:08:14.820
probably don't fully appreciate the distinction
link |
00:08:17.220
between speech and language, right?
link |
00:08:19.540
Speech I think of as the motor patterns,
link |
00:08:21.440
the production of sound that has meaning, hopefully,
link |
00:08:25.740
and language, of course, come in various languages
link |
00:08:29.100
and varieties of ways of communicating.
link |
00:08:31.860
But in terms of the study of speech and language
link |
00:08:34.740
and thinking about how the brain organizes
link |
00:08:37.260
speech and language, what are the similarities?
link |
00:08:40.420
What are the differences?
link |
00:08:41.380
How should we think about speech and language?
link |
00:08:43.180
Yeah, well, I'm glad you invited me here,
link |
00:08:46.800
and I'm also glad to get that first question,
link |
00:08:50.140
which I can consider a provocative one.
link |
00:08:52.580
The reason why, I've been struggling,
link |
00:08:55.420
what is the difference with speech and language
link |
00:08:57.380
for many years, and realize why am I struggling
link |
00:09:00.760
is because there are behavioral terms,
link |
00:09:03.100
let's call them psychology-developed kind of terms,
link |
00:09:07.740
that don't actually align exactly with brain function, right?
link |
00:09:12.660
And the question is,
link |
00:09:13.500
is there a distinction between speech and language?
link |
00:09:15.660
And when I look at the brain of work
link |
00:09:18.000
that other people have done, work we have done,
link |
00:09:20.060
also compared it with animal models,
link |
00:09:21.900
like those who can imitate sounds,
link |
00:09:23.380
like parrots and songbirds,
link |
00:09:25.580
I start to see there really isn't such a sharp distinction.
link |
00:09:29.580
So to get at what I think is going on,
link |
00:09:32.360
let me tell you how some people think of it now,
link |
00:09:35.700
that there's a separate language module in the brain
link |
00:09:39.460
that has all the algorithms and computations
link |
00:09:42.280
that influence the speech pathway on how to produce sound,
link |
00:09:46.300
and the auditory pathway on how to perceive and interpret it
link |
00:09:51.140
for speech or for sound that we call speech.
link |
00:09:55.120
And it turns out, I don't think there is any good evidence
link |
00:10:00.120
for a separate language module.
link |
00:10:02.120
Instead, there is a speech production pathway
link |
00:10:06.800
that's controlling our larynx, controlling our jaw muscles,
link |
00:10:10.040
that has built within it all the complex algorithms
link |
00:10:14.160
for spoken language, and there's the auditory pathway
link |
00:10:18.200
that has built within it all the complex algorithms
link |
00:10:20.840
for understanding speech,
link |
00:10:22.480
not separate from a language module.
link |
00:10:24.840
And this speech production pathway is specialized to humans
link |
00:10:30.160
and parrots and songbirds,
link |
00:10:32.560
whereas this auditory perception pathway
link |
00:10:35.280
is more ubiquitous amongst the animal kingdom,
link |
00:10:38.120
and this is why dogs can understand,
link |
00:10:39.960
sit, siente se, come here, boy, get the ball, and so forth.
link |
00:10:44.840
Dogs can understand several hundred human speech words.
link |
00:10:48.580
Great apes, you can teach them for several thousand,
link |
00:10:51.320
but they can't say a word.
link |
00:10:52.760
Fascinating.
link |
00:10:55.320
Because you've raised a number of animal species
link |
00:10:58.100
early on here, and because I have basically an obsession
link |
00:11:01.720
with animals since the time I was very small,
link |
00:11:03.560
I have to ask, which animals have language?
link |
00:11:08.960
Which animals have modes of communication
link |
00:11:11.960
that are sort of like language?
link |
00:11:14.120
You know, I've heard whale songs.
link |
00:11:16.320
I don't know what they're saying.
link |
00:11:17.560
They sound very beautiful,
link |
00:11:18.520
but they could be insulting each other for all I know.
link |
00:11:21.760
And they very well may be.
link |
00:11:24.160
Dolphins, birds, I mean, what do we understand
link |
00:11:28.480
about modes of communication that are like language
link |
00:11:32.800
but might not be what would classically be called language?
link |
00:11:36.400
Right, so modes of communication
link |
00:11:40.560
that people would define as language,
link |
00:11:43.300
more in a very narrow definition,
link |
00:11:46.200
they would say production of sound, so speech.
link |
00:11:49.020
But what about the hands, the gesturing with the hands?
link |
00:11:51.680
What about a bird who is doing aerial displays in the air,
link |
00:11:55.360
communicating information through body language, right?
link |
00:11:59.680
Well, I'm gonna go back to the brain.
link |
00:12:02.840
So what I think is going on is for spoken language,
link |
00:12:08.000
we're using the speech pathway
link |
00:12:09.960
in all the complex algorithms there.
link |
00:12:12.040
Next to the brain regions that are controlling
link |
00:12:14.320
spoken language are the brain regions
link |
00:12:16.280
or the brain regions for gesturing with the hands.
link |
00:12:19.400
And that hand parallel pathway
link |
00:12:22.240
has also complex algorithms that we can utilize.
link |
00:12:25.400
And some species are more advanced in these circuits,
link |
00:12:28.560
whether it's sound or gesturing with hands,
link |
00:12:31.320
and some are less advanced.
link |
00:12:33.900
Now, we humans and a few others are the most advanced
link |
00:12:37.300
for the speech sounds or the spoken language,
link |
00:12:41.380
but a non-human primate can produce gesturing
link |
00:12:45.320
in a more advanced form than they could produce sound.
link |
00:12:49.160
I'm not sure I got that across clearly,
link |
00:12:51.400
just to say that humans are the most advanced
link |
00:12:54.960
at spoken language, but not necessarily as big a difference
link |
00:12:59.560
at gestural language compared to some other species.
link |
00:13:03.320
Very clear and very interesting
link |
00:13:05.520
and immediately prompts the question,
link |
00:13:08.440
have there been brain imaging or other sorts of studies
link |
00:13:12.720
evaluating neural activity in the context of cultures
link |
00:13:17.560
and languages, at least that I associate
link |
00:13:19.260
with a lot of hand movement, like Italian versus,
link |
00:13:22.560
I don't know, maybe you could give us some examples
link |
00:13:24.540
of cultures where language is not associated
link |
00:13:27.580
with as much overt hand movement.
link |
00:13:29.540
Yes, so as you and I are talking here today
link |
00:13:32.720
and people who are listening but can't see us,
link |
00:13:35.040
we're actually gesturing with our hands as we talk
link |
00:13:39.220
without knowing it or doing it unconsciously.
link |
00:13:42.460
And if we were talking on a telephone,
link |
00:13:45.040
I would have one hand here and I'd be gesturing
link |
00:13:46.960
with the other hand without even you seeing me, right?
link |
00:13:50.420
And so why is that?
link |
00:13:52.520
Some have argued, and I would agree,
link |
00:13:54.440
based upon what we've seen,
link |
00:13:56.160
is that there's an evolutionary relationship
link |
00:13:58.720
between the brain pathways that control
link |
00:14:00.880
speech production and gesturing.
link |
00:14:04.280
And the brain regions I mentioned
link |
00:14:05.960
are directly adjacent to each other.
link |
00:14:07.440
And why is that?
link |
00:14:08.480
I think that the brain pathways that control speech
link |
00:14:11.120
evolved out of the brain pathways
link |
00:14:13.160
that control body movement, all right?
link |
00:14:16.120
And that when you talk about Italian, French,
link |
00:14:22.080
English, and so forth, each one of those languages
link |
00:14:25.680
come with a learned set of gestures
link |
00:14:29.160
that you can communicate with.
link |
00:14:31.160
Now, how is that related to other animals?
link |
00:14:33.160
Well, Coco, a gorilla, who was raised with humans
link |
00:14:35.920
for 39 years or more, learned how to do gesture,
link |
00:14:41.360
communication, learned how to sign language,
link |
00:14:44.120
so to speak, right?
link |
00:14:45.620
But Coco couldn't produce those sounds.
link |
00:14:48.040
Coco could understand them as well
link |
00:14:51.400
by seeing somebody sign or hearing somebody produce speech.
link |
00:14:56.180
But Coco couldn't produce it with her voice.
link |
00:14:58.800
And so what's going on there is that a number of species,
link |
00:15:03.360
not all of them, a number of species
link |
00:15:05.080
have motor pathways in the brain
link |
00:15:07.160
where you can do learned gesturing,
link |
00:15:09.480
rudimentary language if you wanted, say, with your limbs,
link |
00:15:12.720
even if it's not as advanced as humans.
link |
00:15:14.840
But they don't have this extra brain pathway for the sound.
link |
00:15:18.800
So they can't gesture with their voice
link |
00:15:21.160
in the way that they gesture with their hands.
link |
00:15:23.560
I see.
link |
00:15:24.800
One thing that I've wondered about for a very long time
link |
00:15:27.080
is whether or not primitive emotions
link |
00:15:32.080
and primitive sounds are the early substrate of language,
link |
00:15:37.200
and whether or not there's a bridge that we can draw
link |
00:15:39.840
between those in terms of just the basic respiration systems
link |
00:15:44.480
associated with different extreme feelings.
link |
00:15:47.160
Here's the way I'm imagining this might work.
link |
00:15:50.600
When I smell something delicious,
link |
00:15:53.480
I typically inhale more,
link |
00:15:57.020
and I might say, mm, or something like that.
link |
00:16:00.280
Whereas if I smell something putrid,
link |
00:16:02.040
I typically turn away, I wince,
link |
00:16:04.240
and I will exhale, or sort of kind of like turn away,
link |
00:16:07.900
trying to not ingest those molecules
link |
00:16:10.040
or inhale those molecules.
link |
00:16:11.840
I could imagine that these are the basic
link |
00:16:14.920
dark and light contrasts of the language system.
link |
00:16:18.980
And as I say that,
link |
00:16:19.820
I'm saying that from the orientation of a vision scientist
link |
00:16:23.120
who thinks of all visual images built up
link |
00:16:26.120
in a very basic way of a hierarchical model
link |
00:16:29.160
of the ability to see dark and light.
link |
00:16:31.280
So I could imagine this kind of primitive
link |
00:16:33.480
to more sophisticated pyramid of sound to language.
link |
00:16:40.520
Is this a crazy idea?
link |
00:16:41.640
Do we have any evidence this is the way it works?
link |
00:16:45.520
No, it's not a crazy idea.
link |
00:16:47.120
And in fact, you hit upon one of the key distinctions
link |
00:16:51.900
in the field of research that I had started out in,
link |
00:16:54.520
which is vocal learning research.
link |
00:16:56.560
So for vocal communication,
link |
00:17:00.400
you have most vertebrate species vocalize,
link |
00:17:03.720
but most of them are producing innate sounds
link |
00:17:06.440
that they're born with producing.
link |
00:17:10.280
That is babies crying, for example, or dogs barking.
link |
00:17:15.240
And only a few species have learned vocal communication,
link |
00:17:18.800
the ability to imitate sounds.
link |
00:17:20.480
And that is what makes spoken language special.
link |
00:17:23.520
When people think of what's special about language,
link |
00:17:26.720
it's the learned vocalizations.
link |
00:17:29.320
That is what's rare.
link |
00:17:31.200
And so this distinction between innateness and learned
link |
00:17:36.080
is more of a bigger dichotomy
link |
00:17:38.440
when it comes to vocalizations
link |
00:17:39.640
than for other behaviors in the animal kingdom.
link |
00:17:42.880
And when you go in the brain, you see it there as well.
link |
00:17:47.400
And so all the things you talked about,
link |
00:17:49.560
the breathing, the grunting, and so forth,
link |
00:17:51.920
a lot of that is handled by the brainstem circuits
link |
00:17:55.640
right around the level of your neck and below,
link |
00:17:58.960
like a reflex kind of thing.
link |
00:18:00.840
So, or even some emotional aspects of your behavior
link |
00:18:04.720
in the hypothalamus and so forth.
link |
00:18:06.720
But for a learned behavior, learning how to speak,
link |
00:18:11.040
learning how to play the piano,
link |
00:18:12.840
teaching a dog to learn how to do tricks
link |
00:18:15.600
is using the forebrain circuits.
link |
00:18:18.160
And what has happened is that there's a lot
link |
00:18:20.760
of forebrain circuits that are controlling
link |
00:18:22.520
learning how to move body parts in these species,
link |
00:18:24.520
but not for the vocalizations.
link |
00:18:26.360
But in humans and in parrots and some other species,
link |
00:18:29.760
somehow we acquired circuits where the forebrain
link |
00:18:33.320
has taken over the brainstem,
link |
00:18:36.280
and now using that brainstem not only to produce
link |
00:18:39.200
the innate behaviors or vocal behaviors,
link |
00:18:41.360
but the learned ones as well.
link |
00:18:43.720
Do we have any sense of when modern
link |
00:18:46.840
or sophisticated language evolved?
link |
00:18:50.920
Thinking back to the species that we evolved from
link |
00:18:54.280
and even within Homo sapiens,
link |
00:18:58.080
has there been an evolution of language?
link |
00:18:59.520
Has there been a devolution of language?
link |
00:19:02.160
Yeah, I would say, and to be able to answer that question,
link |
00:19:08.920
it does come with the caveat that I think we humans
link |
00:19:11.480
overrate ourselves when it compared to other species.
link |
00:19:15.040
And so it makes even scientists go astray
link |
00:19:19.200
in trying to hypothesize when you especially
link |
00:19:21.960
don't find fossil evidence of language that easily
link |
00:19:26.760
out there in terms of what happened in the past.
link |
00:19:31.560
We, amongst the primates, which we humans belong to,
link |
00:19:35.800
we are the only ones that have
link |
00:19:37.200
this advanced vocal learning ability.
link |
00:19:39.520
Now, when it was assumed that it was only Homo sapiens,
link |
00:19:45.720
then you can go back in time now based upon genomic data,
link |
00:19:49.720
not only of us living humans,
link |
00:19:51.400
but of the fossils that have been found for Homo sapiens,
link |
00:19:55.120
of Neanderthals, of Denisovan individuals,
link |
00:19:59.000
and discover that our ancestor, our human ancestors,
link |
00:20:04.360
supposedly hybridized with these other hominid species
link |
00:20:08.720
and it was assumed that these other hominid species
link |
00:20:11.680
don't learn how to imitate sounds.
link |
00:20:14.560
I don't know of any species today that's a vocal learner
link |
00:20:18.160
that can have children with a non vocal learning species.
link |
00:20:21.400
I don't see it, it doesn't mean it didn't exist.
link |
00:20:24.160
And when we look at the genetic data
link |
00:20:26.920
from these ancestral hominids that,
link |
00:20:31.000
where we can look at genes that are involved
link |
00:20:33.560
in learning vocal communication,
link |
00:20:35.560
they have the same sequence as we humans do
link |
00:20:39.000
for genes that function in speech circuits.
link |
00:20:41.800
So I think Neanderthals had spoken language.
link |
00:20:44.320
I'm not gonna say it's as advanced as what it is in humans,
link |
00:20:46.960
I don't know, but I think it's been there
link |
00:20:49.240
for at least between 500,000 to a million years
link |
00:20:53.200
that our ancestors had this ability
link |
00:20:56.480
and that we've been coming more and more advanced
link |
00:20:58.640
with it culturally and possibly genetically,
link |
00:21:02.480
but I think it's evolved so much
link |
00:21:04.200
that I think it's evolved sometime
link |
00:21:06.000
in the last 500,000 to a million years.
link |
00:21:08.320
Incredible.
link |
00:21:10.720
Maybe we could talk a little bit more
link |
00:21:11.920
about the overlap between brain circuits
link |
00:21:14.480
that control language and speech in humans
link |
00:21:17.440
and other animals.
link |
00:21:20.240
I was weaned in the neuroscience era
link |
00:21:23.240
where bird song and the ability of birds
link |
00:21:27.600
to learn their tutor song was and still is
link |
00:21:31.000
a prominent field, subfield of neuroscience.
link |
00:21:33.880
And then of course, neuroimaging of humans,
link |
00:21:37.520
speaking and learning, et cetera.
link |
00:21:39.520
And this notion of a critical period,
link |
00:21:41.160
a time in which language is learned more easily
link |
00:21:44.400
than it is later in life.
link |
00:21:46.200
And the names of the different brain areas
link |
00:21:48.800
were quite different.
link |
00:21:51.080
One opens the textbooks, we hear Wernicke's and Broca's
link |
00:21:53.760
for the humans and you look at the birds,
link |
00:21:55.920
I remember, you know.
link |
00:21:57.720
HPC.
link |
00:21:58.720
Robust arch striatum area X.
link |
00:22:00.840
That's right, yes.
link |
00:22:01.800
Et cetera.
link |
00:22:02.780
But for most of our listeners,
link |
00:22:04.600
those names won't mean a whole lot.
link |
00:22:07.000
But in terms of homologies between areas
link |
00:22:11.800
in terms of function, what do we know?
link |
00:22:13.600
And how similar or different are the brain areas
link |
00:22:17.260
controlling speech and language in say,
link |
00:22:19.120
a songbird and a young human child?
link |
00:22:22.440
Yeah.
link |
00:22:23.600
So going back to the 1950s and even a little earlier,
link |
00:22:27.520
Peter Mahler and others who got involved
link |
00:22:30.360
in neuroethology, the study of neurobiology
link |
00:22:34.120
of behavior in a natural way, right?
link |
00:22:37.480
You know, they start to find that behaviorally,
link |
00:22:40.880
there are these species of birds like songbirds and parrots
link |
00:22:43.600
and now we also know hummingbirds, just three of them
link |
00:22:46.080
out of the 40 something bird groups out there
link |
00:22:48.080
on the planet, orders, that they can imitate sounds
link |
00:22:51.460
like we do.
link |
00:22:52.720
And so that was the similarity.
link |
00:22:54.400
In other words, they had this kind of behavior
link |
00:22:56.240
that's more similar to us than chimpanzees have with us
link |
00:22:59.320
or than chickens have with them, right?
link |
00:23:01.720
They're close to relatives.
link |
00:23:03.320
And then they discovered even more similarities,
link |
00:23:05.680
these critical periods that if you remove a child,
link |
00:23:10.400
this unfortunately happens where a child is feral
link |
00:23:13.360
and is not raised with human and goes through
link |
00:23:15.660
their puberty phase of growth,
link |
00:23:18.040
it becomes hard for them to learn a language as an adult.
link |
00:23:21.260
So there's this critical period where you learn best.
link |
00:23:24.080
And even later on when you're in regular society,
link |
00:23:26.420
it's hard to learn.
link |
00:23:27.560
Well, the birds undergo the same thing.
link |
00:23:30.520
And then it was discovered that if they become deaf,
link |
00:23:34.000
we humans become deaf, our speech starts to deteriorate
link |
00:23:37.480
without any kind of therapy.
link |
00:23:40.000
If a non-human primate or let's say a chicken becomes deaf,
link |
00:23:46.520
their vocalizations don't deteriorate, very little at least.
link |
00:23:50.400
Well, this happens in the vocal learning birds.
link |
00:23:52.920
So there were all these behavioral parallels
link |
00:23:54.820
that came along in a package.
link |
00:23:56.560
And then people looked into the brain.
link |
00:23:58.960
Fernando Nadeva, my former PhD advisor,
link |
00:24:01.520
and began to discover the area X you talked about,
link |
00:24:05.320
the robust nucleus of the archipelium.
link |
00:24:07.900
And these brain pathways were not found
link |
00:24:12.000
in the species who couldn't imitate.
link |
00:24:13.360
So there was a parallel here.
link |
00:24:15.000
And then jumping many years later,
link |
00:24:18.440
I started to dig down into these brain circuits
link |
00:24:21.400
to discover that these brain circuits
link |
00:24:23.800
have parallel functions with the brain circuits for humans,
link |
00:24:26.800
even though they're by a different name
link |
00:24:28.240
like Broca's and laryngomotor cortex.
link |
00:24:30.880
And most recently, we discovered not only the actual
link |
00:24:34.400
circuitry and the connectivity are similar,
link |
00:24:36.500
but the underlying genes that are expressed
link |
00:24:39.160
in these brain regions in a specialized way,
link |
00:24:41.840
different from the rest of the brain are also similar
link |
00:24:44.440
between humans and songbirds and parrots.
link |
00:24:46.820
So all the way down to the genes,
link |
00:24:48.160
and now we're finding the specific mutations
link |
00:24:51.280
are also similar, not always identical, but similar,
link |
00:24:54.880
which indicates remarkable convergence
link |
00:24:57.040
for so-called complex behavior in species
link |
00:25:00.020
separated by 300 million years from the common ancestor.
link |
00:25:02.880
And not only that, we are discovering that mutations
link |
00:25:07.400
in these genes that cause speech deficits in humans,
link |
00:25:10.780
like in FOXP2, if you put those same mutations
link |
00:25:15.200
or similar type of deficits in these vocal learning birds,
link |
00:25:18.040
you get similar deficits.
link |
00:25:19.760
So convergence of the behavior is associated
link |
00:25:22.800
with similar genetic disorders of the behavior.
link |
00:25:25.640
Incredible.
link |
00:25:26.920
I have to ask, do hummingbirds sing or do they hum?
link |
00:25:31.040
Hummingbirds hum with their wings
link |
00:25:32.960
and sing with their syrinx.
link |
00:25:34.800
In a coordinated way?
link |
00:25:36.160
In a coordinated way.
link |
00:25:37.580
There's some species of hummingbirds that actually will,
link |
00:25:43.120
Doug Ashford showed this, that will flap their wings
link |
00:25:47.000
and create a slapping sound with their wings
link |
00:25:50.020
that's in unison with their song.
link |
00:25:52.320
And you would not know it,
link |
00:25:54.240
but it sounds like a particular syllable in their songs,
link |
00:25:58.620
even though it's their wings
link |
00:26:00.360
and their voice at the same time.
link |
00:26:02.120
Hummingbirds are clapping to their song.
link |
00:26:04.520
Clapping, they're snapping their wings together
link |
00:26:08.280
in unison with a song to make it like,
link |
00:26:10.900
if I'm going, ba da da da da da, ba da,
link |
00:26:14.080
you know, and I banged on the table.
link |
00:26:15.800
Except they make it almost sound like their voice
link |
00:26:18.120
with their wings.
link |
00:26:20.220
Incredible.
link |
00:26:21.060
Yes.
link |
00:26:21.880
I'm-
link |
00:26:22.720
And they got some of the smallest-
link |
00:26:23.560
I guess as the kids would say, mind blown, right?
link |
00:26:26.200
Incredible.
link |
00:26:27.020
Yes.
link |
00:26:27.860
Incredible, I love hummingbirds.
link |
00:26:28.760
And I always feel like it's such a special thing
link |
00:26:31.120
to get a moment to see one because they move around so fast
link |
00:26:33.440
and they flit away so fast in these ballistic trajectories
link |
00:26:37.140
that when you get to see one stationary for a moment
link |
00:26:40.720
or even just hovering there,
link |
00:26:42.880
you feel like you're extracting so much
link |
00:26:44.400
from their little microcosm of life.
link |
00:26:47.160
But now I realize they're playing music essentially.
link |
00:26:49.720
Right, exactly.
link |
00:26:50.560
And what's amazing about hummingbirds
link |
00:26:53.040
and we're gonna say vocal learning species in general
link |
00:26:56.360
is that for whatever reason,
link |
00:26:58.240
they seem to evolve multiple complex traits.
link |
00:27:01.880
You know, this idea that the evolving language,
link |
00:27:04.880
spoken language in particular,
link |
00:27:06.860
comes along with a set of specializations.
link |
00:27:09.760
Incredible.
link |
00:27:11.320
When I was coming up in neuroscience,
link |
00:27:13.640
I learned that, I think it was the work of Peter Marler,
link |
00:27:17.560
that young birds learn, songbirds, learn their tutor's song
link |
00:27:23.360
and learn it quite well,
link |
00:27:26.320
but that they could learn the song of another tutor.
link |
00:27:29.500
In other words, they could learn a different,
link |
00:27:31.160
and for the listeners, I'm doing air quotes here,
link |
00:27:32.880
a different language, a different bird song,
link |
00:27:35.600
different than their own species song,
link |
00:27:37.600
but never as well as they could learn
link |
00:27:39.660
their own natural genetically linked song.
link |
00:27:44.440
Yes.
link |
00:27:45.280
Genetically linked, meaning that it would be like
link |
00:27:47.120
me being raised in a different culture
link |
00:27:48.860
and that I would learn the other language,
link |
00:27:52.920
but not as well as I would have learned English.
link |
00:27:55.720
This is the idea.
link |
00:27:56.760
Yes.
link |
00:27:57.600
Is that true?
link |
00:27:58.420
That is true, yes.
link |
00:27:59.260
And that's what I learned growing up as well
link |
00:28:01.200
and talked to Peter Marler himself about before he passed.
link |
00:28:05.800
Yeah, he used to call it
link |
00:28:07.120
the innate predisposition to learn.
link |
00:28:09.520
All right, so, which would be kind of the equivalent
link |
00:28:13.920
in the linguistic community of universal grammar.
link |
00:28:16.440
There is something genetically influencing
link |
00:28:21.240
our vocal communication on top of what we learn culturally.
link |
00:28:25.520
And so there is this balance between
link |
00:28:27.640
the genetic control of speech or a song in these birds
link |
00:28:31.440
and the learned cultural control.
link |
00:28:34.400
And so, yes, if you were to take, you know,
link |
00:28:39.800
I mean, in this case, we actually tried this
link |
00:28:41.600
at Rockefeller later on,
link |
00:28:42.960
take a zebra finch and raise it with a canary,
link |
00:28:46.640
it would sing a song that was sort of like
link |
00:28:49.080
a hybrid in between.
link |
00:28:49.920
We call it a keninch, right?
link |
00:28:51.920
And vice versa for the canary,
link |
00:28:55.280
because there's something different about their
link |
00:28:56.840
vocal musculature or the circuitry in the brain.
link |
00:29:00.560
And with a zebra finch,
link |
00:29:01.640
even with a closely related species,
link |
00:29:03.760
if you would take a zebra finch, a young animal,
link |
00:29:07.320
and in one cage next to it,
link |
00:29:08.840
place its own species, adult male, right?
link |
00:29:12.120
And in the other cage place a Bengalese finch next to it,
link |
00:29:15.480
it would preferably learn the song
link |
00:29:17.680
from its own species neighbor.
link |
00:29:20.400
But if you remove its neighbor,
link |
00:29:22.160
it would learn that Bengalese finch very well.
link |
00:29:24.920
Fantastic.
link |
00:29:25.760
So there's, it has something to do with also
link |
00:29:27.960
the social bonding with your own species.
link |
00:29:30.360
Incredible.
link |
00:29:31.600
That raises a question that I based on something
link |
00:29:34.080
I also heard, but I don't have any scientific
link |
00:29:37.240
peer reviewed publication to point to,
link |
00:29:38.960
which is this idea of pigeon, not the bird,
link |
00:29:41.480
but this idea of when multiple cultures and languages
link |
00:29:45.760
converge in a given geographic area,
link |
00:29:47.680
that the children of all the different native languages
link |
00:29:50.400
will come up with their own language.
link |
00:29:53.240
I think this was in island culture,
link |
00:29:55.000
maybe in Hawaii called pigeon,
link |
00:29:56.840
which is sort of a hybrid of the various languages
link |
00:29:59.560
that their parents speak at home.
link |
00:30:01.360
And that they themselves speak.
link |
00:30:03.360
And that somehow pigeon, again, not the bird,
link |
00:30:06.600
but a language called pigeon for reasons I don't know,
link |
00:30:10.440
harbors certain basic elements of all language.
link |
00:30:14.640
Is that true?
link |
00:30:15.800
Is that not true?
link |
00:30:16.640
I haven't studied enough myself
link |
00:30:19.400
in terms of pigeon specifically,
link |
00:30:21.520
but in terms of cultural evolution of language
link |
00:30:24.160
and hybridization between different cultures and so forth,
link |
00:30:27.560
even amongst birds with different dialects.
link |
00:30:30.560
And you bring them together.
link |
00:30:33.760
What is going on here is cultural evolution
link |
00:30:37.960
remarkably tracks genetic evolution.
link |
00:30:41.160
So if you bring people from two separate populations
link |
00:30:44.720
together that have been in their separate populations
link |
00:30:47.360
evolutionarily at least for hundreds of generations.
link |
00:30:51.360
So someone's speaking Chinese, someone's speaking English.
link |
00:30:54.560
And that child then is learning from both of them.
link |
00:30:58.240
Yes, that child is gonna be able to pick up
link |
00:31:00.680
and merge phonemes and words together
link |
00:31:06.080
in a way that an adult wouldn't.
link |
00:31:08.560
Because why they're experiencing both languages
link |
00:31:11.720
at the same time during their critical period years
link |
00:31:16.040
in a way that adults would not be able to experience.
link |
00:31:19.760
And so you get a hybrid.
link |
00:31:21.560
And the lowest common denominator
link |
00:31:23.600
is gonna be what they share.
link |
00:31:25.360
And so the phonemes that they've retained
link |
00:31:27.800
in each of their languages is what's gonna be,
link |
00:31:31.840
I imagine, used the most.
link |
00:31:33.600
Interesting.
link |
00:31:35.200
So we've got brain circuits in songbirds and in humans
link |
00:31:40.120
that in many ways are similar,
link |
00:31:41.760
perhaps not in their exact wiring
link |
00:31:43.760
but in their basic contour of wiring.
link |
00:31:45.920
And genes that are expressed in both sets of neural circuits
link |
00:31:49.440
in very distinct species that are responsible
link |
00:31:53.240
for these phenomenon we're calling speech and language.
link |
00:31:56.840
What sorts of things are those genes controlling?
link |
00:32:00.560
I could imagine they were controlling
link |
00:32:02.520
the wiring of connections between brain areas,
link |
00:32:05.280
essentially a map of a circuit,
link |
00:32:08.840
basically like an engineer would design a circuit
link |
00:32:10.720
for speech and language,
link |
00:32:11.600
nature designed the circuit for speech and language.
link |
00:32:14.800
But presumably other things too,
link |
00:32:16.800
like the ability to connect motor patterns
link |
00:32:22.440
within the throat of muscles within the throat
link |
00:32:24.560
when the control of the tongue.
link |
00:32:26.000
I mean, what are these genes doing?
link |
00:32:27.760
You're pretty good.
link |
00:32:28.840
Yeah, you've made some very good guesses there
link |
00:32:30.800
that make sense.
link |
00:32:33.240
So yes, one of the things that differ
link |
00:32:36.800
in the speech pathways of us
link |
00:32:38.320
and these song pathways of birds
link |
00:32:39.800
is some of the connections are fundamentally different
link |
00:32:42.440
than the surrounding circuits,
link |
00:32:44.040
like a direct cortical connection
link |
00:32:47.920
from the areas that control vocalizations in the cortex
link |
00:32:50.280
to the motor neurons that control the larynx in humans
link |
00:32:53.520
or the syrinx in birds.
link |
00:32:54.920
And so we've actually made a prediction
link |
00:32:57.600
that since some of these connections differ,
link |
00:33:00.080
we're gonna find genes that control neural connectivity
link |
00:33:03.640
and that specialize in that function, that differ.
link |
00:33:05.880
And that's exactly what we found.
link |
00:33:09.240
Genes that control what we call axon guidance
link |
00:33:11.520
and form-instant connections.
link |
00:33:12.880
And what was interesting,
link |
00:33:14.040
it was sort of in the opposite direction that we expected.
link |
00:33:17.960
That is, some of these genes,
link |
00:33:20.600
actually a number of them
link |
00:33:21.600
that control neural connectivity were turned off
link |
00:33:24.880
in the speech circuit.
link |
00:33:27.840
And it didn't make sense to us at first
link |
00:33:29.400
and so we started to realize the function of these genes
link |
00:33:31.760
are to repel connections from forming.
link |
00:33:34.520
So repulsive molecules.
link |
00:33:36.440
And so when you turn them off,
link |
00:33:38.600
they allow certain connections to form
link |
00:33:40.280
that normally would have not formed.
link |
00:33:42.240
So by turning it off,
link |
00:33:43.880
you gotta gain a function for speech.
link |
00:33:47.560
Other genes that surprised us
link |
00:33:49.720
were genes involved in calcium buffering, neural protection,
link |
00:33:54.040
like a parvalbumin or a heat shock protein.
link |
00:33:56.720
So when your brain gets hot, these proteins turn on.
link |
00:33:59.720
And we couldn't figure out for a long time
link |
00:34:01.320
why is that the case?
link |
00:34:03.000
And then the idea popped to me one day and said,
link |
00:34:05.600
ah, when I heard the larynx
link |
00:34:08.120
is the fastest firing muscles in the body, all right?
link |
00:34:11.720
In order to vibrate sound
link |
00:34:13.840
and modulate sound in the way we do,
link |
00:34:16.720
you have to control, you have to move those muscles,
link |
00:34:20.600
you know, three to four to five times faster
link |
00:34:23.120
than just regular walking or running.
link |
00:34:25.480
And so when you stick electrodes in the brain areas
link |
00:34:29.920
that control larynx vocalizations in these birds
link |
00:34:32.280
and I think in humans as well,
link |
00:34:34.480
those neurons are firing at a higher rate
link |
00:34:36.920
to control these muscles.
link |
00:34:38.760
And so what is that gonna do?
link |
00:34:40.960
You're gonna have lots of toxicity in those neurons
link |
00:34:43.600
unless you upregulate molecules
link |
00:34:45.440
that take out the extra load
link |
00:34:48.760
that is needed to control the larynx.
link |
00:34:51.000
And then finally, a third set of genes
link |
00:34:52.880
that are specialized in these speed circuit
link |
00:34:55.240
are involved in neuroplasticity.
link |
00:34:57.880
Neuroplasticity meaning allowing the brain circuits
link |
00:35:01.600
to be more flexible so you can learn better.
link |
00:35:05.520
And why is that?
link |
00:35:06.800
I think learning how to produce speech
link |
00:35:09.240
is a more complex learning ability
link |
00:35:12.600
than say learning how to walk
link |
00:35:14.560
or learning how to do tricks and jumps and so forth
link |
00:35:18.400
that dogs do.
link |
00:35:19.720
Yeah, it's interesting as you say that
link |
00:35:21.360
because I realized that many aspects of speech
link |
00:35:24.640
are sort of reflexive.
link |
00:35:25.720
I'm not thinking about each word I'm gonna say.
link |
00:35:27.760
They just sort of roll out of my mouth.
link |
00:35:29.080
Hopefully with some forethought,
link |
00:35:31.000
we both know people that seem to think less,
link |
00:35:35.240
fewer synapses between their brain and their mouth
link |
00:35:37.360
than others, right?
link |
00:35:38.320
A lot of examples out there.
link |
00:35:39.760
And some people are very deliberate in their speech.
link |
00:35:41.600
But nonetheless, much of speech has to be precise
link |
00:35:46.440
and some of it less precise.
link |
00:35:49.000
In terms of plasticity of speech,
link |
00:35:51.320
and the ability to learn multiple languages,
link |
00:35:53.680
but even just one language,
link |
00:35:55.680
what's going on in the critical period,
link |
00:35:57.880
the so-called critical period?
link |
00:35:59.200
Why is it that, so my niece speaks Spanish,
link |
00:36:02.960
she's Guatemalan, speaks Spanish and English incredibly well.
link |
00:36:06.240
She's 14 years old.
link |
00:36:08.160
I've struggled with Spanish my whole life.
link |
00:36:09.640
My father's bilingual, my mother is not.
link |
00:36:11.720
I've tried to learn Spanish as an adult.
link |
00:36:14.000
It's really challenging.
link |
00:36:15.920
I'm told that had I learned it when I was eight,
link |
00:36:18.100
I would be better off.
link |
00:36:19.200
That's right.
link |
00:36:20.020
Or it would be installed within me.
link |
00:36:22.680
So the first question is,
link |
00:36:24.500
is it easier to learn multiple languages
link |
00:36:26.360
without an accent early in life?
link |
00:36:28.080
And if so, why?
link |
00:36:29.260
And then the second question is,
link |
00:36:30.800
if one can already speak more than one language
link |
00:36:34.560
as a consequence of childhood learning,
link |
00:36:36.640
is it easier to acquire new languages later on?
link |
00:36:39.940
So the answer to both of those questions is yes.
link |
00:36:42.800
In that, but to explain this,
link |
00:36:47.360
I need to let you know,
link |
00:36:49.020
actually the entire brain
link |
00:36:51.380
is undergoing a critical period development,
link |
00:36:54.360
not just the speech pathways.
link |
00:36:56.340
And so it's easier to learn how to play a piano.
link |
00:36:59.280
It's easier to learn how to ride a bike for the first time
link |
00:37:02.120
and so forth as a young child than it is later in life.
link |
00:37:07.220
What I mean easier in terms of when you start from,
link |
00:37:10.920
you start from first principles of learning something.
link |
00:37:13.920
So the very first time if you're gonna learn Chinese
link |
00:37:16.560
as a child versus the very first time
link |
00:37:18.440
you learn Chinese as an adult,
link |
00:37:20.120
or learning to play piano as a child versus an adult.
link |
00:37:24.360
But the speech pathways, or let's say speech behavior,
link |
00:37:28.360
I think has a stronger critical period change to it
link |
00:37:32.720
than other circuits.
link |
00:37:34.320
And what's going on there in general?
link |
00:37:39.600
Why do you need a critical period to make you more stable,
link |
00:37:44.000
to make you more stubborn, so to speak?
link |
00:37:47.200
The reason I believe is that the brain is not,
link |
00:37:52.360
brain can only hold so much information.
link |
00:37:55.600
And if you are undergoing rapid learning
link |
00:38:00.440
to acquire new knowledge,
link |
00:38:02.680
you also have to dump stuff,
link |
00:38:05.800
put memory or information in the trash, like in a computer.
link |
00:38:10.220
You only have so many gigabases of memory.
link |
00:38:13.000
And so therefore, plus also for survival,
link |
00:38:17.280
you don't wanna keep forgetting things.
link |
00:38:19.640
And so the brain is designed, I believe,
link |
00:38:23.840
to undergo this critical period and solidify the circuits
link |
00:38:27.880
with what you learned as a child
link |
00:38:29.400
and you use that for the rest of your life.
link |
00:38:31.120
And we humans stay even more plastic in our brain functions
link |
00:38:36.000
controlled by a gene called SR-GAP2.
link |
00:38:38.480
We have an extra copy of it
link |
00:38:40.040
that leaves our speech circuit in other brain regions
link |
00:38:42.240
in a more immature state throughout life
link |
00:38:44.520
compared to other animals.
link |
00:38:46.080
So we're more immature.
link |
00:38:47.720
We're still juvenile-like compared to other animals.
link |
00:38:49.760
I knew it.
link |
00:38:50.600
But we still go through the critical periods
link |
00:38:52.880
like they all do.
link |
00:38:54.240
And now the question you asked about
link |
00:38:57.120
if you learn more languages as a child,
link |
00:39:01.720
is it easier to learn as an adult?
link |
00:39:03.480
And that's a common finding out there in the literature.
link |
00:39:06.380
There are some that argue against it.
link |
00:39:08.140
But for those that support it, the idea there is
link |
00:39:10.800
that you are born with a set of innate sounds
link |
00:39:14.640
you can produce of phonemes and you narrow that down
link |
00:39:18.040
because not all languages use all of them.
link |
00:39:20.400
And so you narrow down the ones you use
link |
00:39:22.680
to string the phonemes together in the words that you learn
link |
00:39:26.140
and you maintain those phonemes as an adult.
link |
00:39:29.320
And here comes along another language
link |
00:39:31.640
that's using those phonemes in different combinations
link |
00:39:34.440
you're not used to.
link |
00:39:36.240
And therefore, it's like starting from first principles.
link |
00:39:39.480
But if you already have them
link |
00:39:41.080
in multiple languages that you're using,
link |
00:39:43.240
then it makes it easier to use them
link |
00:39:45.080
in another third or fourth language.
link |
00:39:47.600
I see.
link |
00:39:48.520
Incredible.
link |
00:39:49.760
So it's not like your brain has maintained greater plasticity
link |
00:39:54.560
is your brain has maintained greater ability
link |
00:39:57.440
to produce different sounds
link |
00:39:59.540
that then allows you to learn another language faster.
link |
00:40:02.160
Got it.
link |
00:40:03.600
Are the hand gestures associated with sounds
link |
00:40:08.020
or with meanings of words?
link |
00:40:10.200
I think the hand gestures are associated
link |
00:40:11.920
with both the sounds and the meaning.
link |
00:40:14.480
When I say sound, like if you are really angry, right?
link |
00:40:19.320
And you are making a loud screaming noise, right?
link |
00:40:22.840
You may make hand gestures
link |
00:40:25.120
that look like you're gonna beat the wall, right?
link |
00:40:27.880
Because you're making loud sounds and loud gestures,
link |
00:40:31.440
all right?
link |
00:40:32.680
But if you wanna explain something like come over here,
link |
00:40:35.900
what I just do now to you, for those who can't see me,
link |
00:40:38.660
I swung my hand towards you and swung it here to me.
link |
00:40:41.880
That has a meaning to it, to come here.
link |
00:40:44.480
So just like with the voice,
link |
00:40:46.800
the hand gestures are producing both qualities of sounds.
link |
00:40:53.120
And for people that speak multiple languages,
link |
00:40:55.880
especially those that learn those multiple languages
link |
00:40:58.420
early in development,
link |
00:40:59.760
do they switch their patterns of motor movements
link |
00:41:02.280
according to, let's say, going from Italian to Arabic
link |
00:41:06.600
or from Arabic to French in a way that matches
link |
00:41:10.640
the precision of language that they're speaking?
link |
00:41:13.960
You know what?
link |
00:41:14.800
You just asked me a question I don't know the answer to.
link |
00:41:17.120
I would imagine that would make sense
link |
00:41:19.400
because of switching in terms of,
link |
00:41:24.020
sometimes people might call this code switching,
link |
00:41:25.920
even different dialects of the same language.
link |
00:41:28.400
Could you do that with your gestures?
link |
00:41:30.560
I imagine so, but I really don't know if that's true or not.
link |
00:41:34.320
I certainly don't know from my own experience
link |
00:41:35.880
because I only speak one language.
link |
00:41:39.640
Before we continue with today's discussion,
link |
00:41:41.880
I'd like to just briefly acknowledge our sponsor,
link |
00:41:43.960
Athletic Greens, now called AG1.
link |
00:41:47.160
Athletic Greens, AKA AG1,
link |
00:41:49.440
is an all-in-one vitamin mineral probiotic drink
link |
00:41:51.880
that also has adaptogens and digestive enzymes.
link |
00:41:54.940
I've been taking Athletic Greens since way back in 2012,
link |
00:41:57.680
so I'm delighted that they're sponsoring the podcast.
link |
00:42:00.100
The reason I started taking Athletic Greens
link |
00:42:01.720
and the reason I still drink Athletic Greens twice a day
link |
00:42:04.640
is that it supplies total foundational coverage
link |
00:42:07.560
of my vitamin mineral needs
link |
00:42:08.960
and it supplies important nutrients that I need
link |
00:42:11.880
to support my gut microbiome.
link |
00:42:13.440
The gut microbiome, as many of you know,
link |
00:42:15.180
supports the immune system.
link |
00:42:16.280
It also supports the so-called gut-brain axis,
link |
00:42:18.320
which is vital for mood, for energy levels,
link |
00:42:20.680
for regulating focus, and many other features
link |
00:42:23.020
of our mental health and physical health
link |
00:42:24.500
that impact our daily performance and high performance
link |
00:42:27.000
in any endeavors we might be involved in.
link |
00:42:29.120
If you'd like to try Athletic Greens,
link |
00:42:30.520
you can go to athleticgreens.com slash Huberman
link |
00:42:33.200
and claim a special offer.
link |
00:42:34.800
They're giving away five free travel packs
link |
00:42:36.460
plus a year supply of vitamin D3K2 with every order.
link |
00:42:40.360
And of course, vitamin D3K2 are vital
link |
00:42:42.560
for all sorts of things like hormone health
link |
00:42:44.640
and metabolic health and K2 for cardiovascular health
link |
00:42:47.080
and calcium regulation.
link |
00:42:48.240
Again, you can go to athleticgreens.com slash Huberman
link |
00:42:51.460
to claim that special offer.
link |
00:42:52.860
To go a little bit into the abstract, but not too far,
link |
00:42:57.560
what about modes of speech and language
link |
00:42:59.440
that seem to have a depth of emotionality and meaning,
link |
00:43:03.040
but for which it departs from structured language?
link |
00:43:07.080
Here's what I mean, poetry.
link |
00:43:10.000
I think of musicians, like there are some Bob Dylan songs
link |
00:43:13.160
that to me, I understand the individual words.
link |
00:43:17.180
I like to think there's an emotion associated with it.
link |
00:43:20.240
At least I experienced some sort of emotion
link |
00:43:21.960
and I have a guess about what he was experiencing.
link |
00:43:25.660
But if I were to just read it linearly without the music
link |
00:43:29.480
and without him singing it or somebody singing it like him,
link |
00:43:32.800
it wouldn't hold any meaning.
link |
00:43:33.840
So in other words, words that seem to have meaning
link |
00:43:37.200
but not associated with language,
link |
00:43:39.660
but somehow tap into an emotionality.
link |
00:43:43.100
Yep, absolutely.
link |
00:43:44.120
So we call this difference semantic communication,
link |
00:43:49.200
communication with meaning, and affective communication,
link |
00:43:52.600
communication that has more of an emotional
link |
00:43:56.200
feeling content to it, but not with the semantics.
link |
00:44:00.320
And the two can be mixed up,
link |
00:44:02.600
like with singing words that have meaning
link |
00:44:05.720
but also have this affective emotional,
link |
00:44:07.960
you just love the sound of the singer that you're hearing.
link |
00:44:12.040
And initially, psychologists, scientists in general
link |
00:44:18.800
thought that these were gonna be controlled
link |
00:44:20.600
by different brain circuits.
link |
00:44:23.080
And it is the case there are emotional brain centers
link |
00:44:25.800
in the hypothalamus, in the cingulate cortex and so forth
link |
00:44:29.760
that do give tone to the sounds.
link |
00:44:33.100
But I believe based upon imaging work
link |
00:44:37.160
and work we see in birds,
link |
00:44:39.140
when birds are communicating semantic information
link |
00:44:42.740
in their sounds, which is not too often but it happens,
link |
00:44:45.680
versus affective communication,
link |
00:44:48.560
sing because I'm trying to attract the mate,
link |
00:44:50.600
my courtship song or defend my territory,
link |
00:44:53.420
it's the same brain circuits.
link |
00:44:54.720
It's the same speech-like or song circuits
link |
00:44:57.160
are being used in different ways.
link |
00:45:00.880
A friend of mine who's also a therapist said to me,
link |
00:45:04.280
it's possible to say, I love you with intense hatred
link |
00:45:07.960
and to say, I hate you with intense love.
link |
00:45:10.560
And reminded me that it's possible to hear
link |
00:45:12.560
both of those statements in either way.
link |
00:45:15.120
So I guess it's not just limited to song
link |
00:45:18.520
or poetry, it also, there's something about the intention
link |
00:45:23.720
and the emotional context in which something's spoken
link |
00:45:27.280
that it can heavily shape the way
link |
00:45:29.080
that we interpret what we hear.
link |
00:45:31.320
That's right, and I consider all of that actually meaning,
link |
00:45:35.440
even though I defined it as,
link |
00:45:37.580
as people commonly do semantic and affective communication,
link |
00:45:41.760
affective communication to say I hate you
link |
00:45:44.000
but love, right, does have emotional meaning to it.
link |
00:45:51.360
And so one's more like an object kind of meaning
link |
00:45:53.760
or an abstract kind of meaning.
link |
00:45:55.560
There's several other points here I think it's important
link |
00:45:57.600
for those listening out there to hear,
link |
00:46:00.460
is that when I say also this affective
link |
00:46:03.240
and semantic communication being used
link |
00:46:07.800
by similar brain circuits,
link |
00:46:08.860
it also matters the side of the brain.
link |
00:46:11.320
In birds and in humans, there's left right dominance
link |
00:46:17.360
for learned communication, learned sound communication.
link |
00:46:21.520
So the left in us humans is more dominant for speech.
link |
00:46:25.680
But the right has a more balance for singing
link |
00:46:29.240
or processing musical sounds
link |
00:46:31.160
as opposed to processing speech.
link |
00:46:32.840
Both get used for both reasons.
link |
00:46:34.840
And so when people say your right brain
link |
00:46:37.600
is your artistic brain and your left brain
link |
00:46:40.080
is your thinking brain, this is what they're referring to.
link |
00:46:43.720
And so that's another distinction.
link |
00:46:46.200
The second thing that's useful to know
link |
00:46:49.720
is that all vocal learning species use their learned sounds
link |
00:46:53.300
for this emotional affective kind of communication.
link |
00:46:58.040
But only a few of them like humans
link |
00:47:00.360
and some parrots and dolphins use it
link |
00:47:02.640
for the semantic kind of communication calling speech.
link |
00:47:06.640
And that has led a number of people to hypothesize
link |
00:47:11.320
that the evolution of spoken language of speech
link |
00:47:14.480
evolved first for singing,
link |
00:47:17.220
for this more like emotional kind of made attraction
link |
00:47:21.400
like the Jennifer Lopez, the Ricky Martin kind of songs
link |
00:47:24.080
and so forth.
link |
00:47:25.520
And then later on, it became used for abstract communication
link |
00:47:29.640
like we're doing now.
link |
00:47:31.200
Interesting.
link |
00:47:32.240
Well, that's a perfect segue for me
link |
00:47:34.720
to be able to ask you about your background
link |
00:47:38.400
and motor control, not only of the hands, but of the body.
link |
00:47:42.700
So you have a number of important distinctions to your name,
link |
00:47:46.320
but one of them is that you were a member
link |
00:47:49.100
of the Alvin Ailey Dance School of Dance.
link |
00:47:52.560
That's right.
link |
00:47:54.040
So you're an accomplished and quite able dancer, right?
link |
00:47:58.180
Tell us a little bit about your background
link |
00:48:00.880
in the world of dance.
link |
00:48:03.120
And how it informs your interest in neuroscience,
link |
00:48:07.480
excuse me, and perhaps even how it relates specifically
link |
00:48:10.560
to your work on speech and language.
link |
00:48:12.120
Yes.
link |
00:48:13.080
Well, it's interesting.
link |
00:48:14.520
And then this kind of history even goes before my time.
link |
00:48:17.320
So in my family, my mother and father's side,
link |
00:48:19.920
they both went to the High School of Music and Art
link |
00:48:21.720
here in New York City.
link |
00:48:23.600
And particularly my mother's family,
link |
00:48:25.220
going back multiple generations, they were singers.
link |
00:48:28.320
And I even did my family genealogy and found out
link |
00:48:31.640
not only we have some relationships
link |
00:48:33.920
to some well-known singers,
link |
00:48:35.480
distant relationships like Thelonious Monk,
link |
00:48:37.800
but going back to the plantations in North Carolina
link |
00:48:42.080
and so forth, my ancestors were singers in the church
link |
00:48:45.840
for the towns and so forth.
link |
00:48:48.000
And this somehow got passed on multiple generations
link |
00:48:51.280
to my family.
link |
00:48:52.120
And I thought I was gonna grow up
link |
00:48:53.720
and be a famous singer, right?
link |
00:48:55.440
And me and my brothers and sister formed a band
link |
00:48:58.860
when we were kids and so forth.
link |
00:49:01.160
And, but it turned out that I didn't inherit
link |
00:49:04.640
the singing talents of some of my other family members,
link |
00:49:07.680
even though it was okay, but not like my brother
link |
00:49:12.000
or not like my mother or my aunts and my cousin Pudafe,
link |
00:49:16.200
who's now a talented Native American singer.
link |
00:49:19.040
And so that then influenced me to do other things.
link |
00:49:24.040
And I started competing in dance contests.
link |
00:49:29.040
Actually this is around the time of the Saturday Night Fever
link |
00:49:31.520
and I was as a teenager and I started winning dance contests
link |
00:49:35.320
and I thought, oh, I can dance.
link |
00:49:37.080
And I auditioned for the High School of Performing Arts
link |
00:49:39.800
and I got in here in New York City
link |
00:49:42.400
and got into ballet dance and got in, right?
link |
00:49:45.160
And thought if I learn ballet, I can learn everything else.
link |
00:49:47.840
It was that idea, if you learn something classical,
link |
00:49:50.000
it can teach you very little.
link |
00:49:51.840
If you learn something classical, it can teach you
link |
00:49:54.280
for everything else.
link |
00:49:56.000
And I was, yeah, at Alvin Ailey Dance School,
link |
00:49:58.640
Joffrey Ballet Dance School.
link |
00:50:00.360
And at the end of my senior concert,
link |
00:50:03.840
I had this opportunity to audition
link |
00:50:06.680
for the Alvin Ailey Dance Company
link |
00:50:08.720
and I had an opportunity to go to college.
link |
00:50:11.440
And I also fell in love with another passion
link |
00:50:13.640
that my father had, which was science.
link |
00:50:16.200
And so I liked science in high school
link |
00:50:18.880
and I found an overlap also between the arts
link |
00:50:21.720
and the sciences.
link |
00:50:23.120
Both required creativity, hard work, discipline,
link |
00:50:27.280
new discovery, both weren't boring to me.
link |
00:50:30.160
And the one decision I made at that senior dance concert
link |
00:50:34.280
was talking to the Alvin Ailey recruiter
link |
00:50:37.200
and thinking about it, I have to make a decision.
link |
00:50:39.800
And I thought something my mother taught me,
link |
00:50:43.200
because she was growing up in the 1960s cultural revolution,
link |
00:50:46.480
do something that has a positive impact on society.
link |
00:50:50.360
I thought I can do that better as a dancer
link |
00:50:52.040
than a scientist.
link |
00:50:53.640
So now jump, I get into college, undergraduate school,
link |
00:50:58.040
I major in molecular biology and mathematics.
link |
00:51:00.360
I decided I wanted to be a biologist,
link |
00:51:02.360
got into graduate school, wanted to study the brain
link |
00:51:05.120
at the Rockefeller University.
link |
00:51:06.680
So I went from Hunter College to Rockefeller University.
link |
00:51:09.040
And so now I got to the brain
link |
00:51:11.480
and why did I choose the brain
link |
00:51:14.360
is because it controls dancing.
link |
00:51:17.840
But there wasn't anybody studying dancing.
link |
00:51:20.320
I wanted to study the brain,
link |
00:51:21.400
something that's really interesting and complex.
link |
00:51:25.120
And I thought, ah, language is what it does.
link |
00:51:27.600
You couldn't study that in mice,
link |
00:51:28.760
you couldn't study in non-human primates,
link |
00:51:30.800
but these birds do this wonderful thing
link |
00:51:32.560
that Fernando Nadebaum was studying at Rockefeller.
link |
00:51:34.880
And so that's what got me into the birds.
link |
00:51:37.840
And then jumping now 15 years later,
link |
00:51:44.320
yeah, that's right, even after I'm into
link |
00:51:46.760
now having my own lab studying vocal learning
link |
00:51:49.880
in these birds as a model for language in humans,
link |
00:51:52.600
it turns out that Ani Patel and others
link |
00:51:58.240
have discovered that only vocal learning species
link |
00:52:02.600
can learn how to dance.
link |
00:52:04.680
Is that right?
link |
00:52:05.520
That's right, yes.
link |
00:52:07.520
So I've seen these, I'm just scrolling through
link |
00:52:10.040
the files here in my mind.
link |
00:52:12.280
I think about every once in a while someone will,
link |
00:52:14.040
I love parrots.
link |
00:52:16.360
Every once in a while someone will send me
link |
00:52:17.880
one of these little Instagram or Twitter videos
link |
00:52:20.200
of a parrot doing what looks to me like dance.
link |
00:52:22.600
Typically it's a cockatoo.
link |
00:52:23.760
That's right, that's right.
link |
00:52:24.920
Even foot stomping to the sound.
link |
00:52:27.120
Famous one called snowball out there,
link |
00:52:28.640
but there are many snowballs out there.
link |
00:52:31.440
They're all, all the dancing birds are named snowball.
link |
00:52:33.800
That's interesting tactic.
link |
00:52:36.120
So only animals with language dance.
link |
00:52:40.160
Yeah, vocal learning in particular,
link |
00:52:41.800
the ability to imitate sounds, yes.
link |
00:52:44.680
Incredible.
link |
00:52:45.520
Yes, and this now is bringing my life full circle.
link |
00:52:49.280
All right, and I, and so when that was discovered in 2009,
link |
00:52:55.400
at that same time in my lab at Duke we discovered
link |
00:52:59.520
that vocal learning brain pathways in songbirds
link |
00:53:03.200
as well as in humans and in parrots, right,
link |
00:53:06.280
like snowball, are embedded within circuits
link |
00:53:09.760
that control learning how to move.
link |
00:53:12.800
And that led us to a theory we called
link |
00:53:14.400
the brain pathway or motor theory of vocal learning origin,
link |
00:53:18.520
where the brain pathways for vocal learning and speech
link |
00:53:21.600
evolve by a whole duplication
link |
00:53:23.760
of the surrounding motor circuits
link |
00:53:25.240
involving learning how to move.
link |
00:53:27.920
Now, how does that explain dance, right?
link |
00:53:31.040
Well, when snowball, the cockatoos are dancing,
link |
00:53:35.600
they're using the brain regions
link |
00:53:37.000
around their speech-like circuits
link |
00:53:38.800
to do this dancing behavior.
link |
00:53:41.120
And so what's going on there?
link |
00:53:42.640
What we hypothesized and now like to test
link |
00:53:46.200
is that when speech evolved in humans
link |
00:53:51.680
and the equivalent behavior in parrots and songbirds,
link |
00:53:54.960
it required a very tight integration
link |
00:53:58.680
in the brain regions that can hear sound
link |
00:54:01.600
with the brain regions that control your muscles
link |
00:54:04.160
from moving your larynx and tongue and so forth
link |
00:54:06.960
for producing sound.
link |
00:54:08.760
And that tight auditory motor integration,
link |
00:54:11.560
we argued then contaminated the surrounding brain regions.
link |
00:54:15.960
And that contamination of the surrounding brain regions
link |
00:54:18.480
now allows us humans in particular in parrots
link |
00:54:22.440
to coordinate our muscle movements
link |
00:54:24.520
of the rest of the body with sound
link |
00:54:27.360
in the same way we do for speech sounds.
link |
00:54:30.360
Well, so we're speaking with our bodies when we dance.
link |
00:54:33.240
Incredible.
link |
00:54:34.080
And I have to say that as poor as I am
link |
00:54:37.080
at speaking multiple languages,
link |
00:54:38.400
I'm even worse at dancing, so.
link |
00:54:41.000
But I guarantee you're better than a monkey.
link |
00:54:43.920
But not Snowball the Cockatoo.
link |
00:54:45.600
Maybe not Snowball.
link |
00:54:47.240
On YouTube, we have a video
link |
00:54:48.560
where there's some scientists dancing with Snowball
link |
00:54:50.880
and you'll see Snowball's doing better
link |
00:54:52.640
than some of the scientists.
link |
00:54:53.680
Okay, well, as long as I'm not the worst
link |
00:54:55.200
of all scientists at dancing,
link |
00:54:58.400
there's always neuroplasticity.
link |
00:55:00.200
May it save me someday.
link |
00:55:03.000
You said something incredible that I completely believe,
link |
00:55:07.200
even though I have minimum to,
link |
00:55:10.320
let's just say minimum dancing ability.
link |
00:55:12.720
I can get by at a party or wedding
link |
00:55:14.640
without complete embarrassment,
link |
00:55:16.280
but I don't have any structured training.
link |
00:55:20.040
So the body clearly can communicate with movement.
link |
00:55:26.880
As a trained dancer and knowing other trained dancers,
link |
00:55:30.840
I always think of dance and bodily movement
link |
00:55:34.840
and communication through bodily movement
link |
00:55:36.600
as a form of a wordlessness,
link |
00:55:38.640
like a state of wordlessness.
link |
00:55:40.240
In fact, the few times when I think
link |
00:55:42.000
that maybe I'm actually dancing modestly well
link |
00:55:45.840
for the context that I'm in,
link |
00:55:47.520
where I see other people dancing
link |
00:55:48.960
and they seem to just be very much in the movement,
link |
00:55:51.400
it's almost like a state of non-language,
link |
00:55:54.400
non-spoken language.
link |
00:55:57.400
And yet what you're telling me
link |
00:55:59.640
is that there's a direct bridge at some level
link |
00:56:02.720
between the movement of the body and language.
link |
00:56:05.680
So is there a language of the body
link |
00:56:08.560
that is distinct from the language of speech?
link |
00:56:12.040
And if so, or if not, how do those map onto one another?
link |
00:56:15.800
What does that Venn diagram look like?
link |
00:56:17.440
Yeah, yeah, so let me define first dance
link |
00:56:21.360
in this context of vocal learning species.
link |
00:56:24.600
This is the kind of dancing
link |
00:56:26.160
that we are specialized in doing,
link |
00:56:28.400
and the vocal learning species is specialized in doing,
link |
00:56:31.400
is synchronizing body movements of muscles
link |
00:56:34.560
to the rhythmic beat of music.
link |
00:56:37.040
And for some reason, we like doing that.
link |
00:56:39.560
We like synchronizing to sound
link |
00:56:42.520
and doing it together as a group of people.
link |
00:56:45.400
And that kind of communication amongst ourselves
link |
00:56:49.120
is more like the effective kind of communication
link |
00:56:51.800
I mentioned earlier, unlike the semantic kind.
link |
00:56:54.920
So we humans are using our voices
link |
00:56:58.160
more for the semantic abstract communication,
link |
00:57:02.440
but we're using learned dance
link |
00:57:04.480
for the effective emotional bonding kind of communication.
link |
00:57:09.200
It doesn't mean we can't communicate
link |
00:57:11.120
semantic information in dance, and we do it,
link |
00:57:14.480
but it's not as popular.
link |
00:57:16.640
Like a ballet in the Nutcracker,
link |
00:57:19.760
it is popular where they are communicating,
link |
00:57:23.960
the Arabian guy comes out,
link |
00:57:26.000
which I was the Arabian guy in the ballet Nutcracker,
link |
00:57:28.200
that's how I remember,
link |
00:57:29.400
for the Westchester Ballet Company when I was a teenager.
link |
00:57:32.200
We're trying to communicate meaning in our ballet dance
link |
00:57:36.680
and it can go on with a whole story and so forth.
link |
00:57:39.680
But people don't interpret that as clearly as speech.
link |
00:57:43.040
They're seeing the ballet with semantic communication
link |
00:57:46.240
with a lot of emotional content.
link |
00:57:48.640
Whereas you go out to a club,
link |
00:57:51.200
you're not communicating, okay, how are you feeling today?
link |
00:57:55.240
Tell me about your day and so forth.
link |
00:57:57.360
You're trying to synchronize with other people
link |
00:58:00.000
in an effective way.
link |
00:58:01.400
And I think that's because the dance brain circuit
link |
00:58:06.960
inherited the more ancient part of the speech circuit,
link |
00:58:10.080
which was for singing.
link |
00:58:12.160
I always had the feeling that with certain forms of music,
link |
00:58:16.200
in particular opera, but any kind of music
link |
00:58:19.000
where there are some long notes sung,
link |
00:58:23.320
that at some level there was a literal resonance
link |
00:58:28.320
created between the singer and the listener.
link |
00:58:31.160
That, or I think of like the deep voice of a Johnny Cash
link |
00:58:35.600
or where at some level you can almost feel the voice
link |
00:58:38.480
in your own body.
link |
00:58:40.040
And in theory, that could be the vibration of the,
link |
00:58:45.240
or the firing of the phrenic nerve
link |
00:58:46.600
controlling the diaphragm for all I know.
link |
00:58:48.800
Is there any evidence that there's a coordination
link |
00:58:50.760
between performer and audience
link |
00:58:53.080
at the level of mind and body?
link |
00:59:00.400
I'm gonna say possibly yes.
link |
00:59:03.760
And the reason why is because I just came back
link |
00:59:05.920
from a conference on the neurobiology of dance.
link |
00:59:10.120
Clearly I'm going to the wrong meetings.
link |
00:59:12.640
Vision science can be so boring.
link |
00:59:14.440
Yes.
link |
00:59:15.280
Well, one of my colleagues, Tecumseh Fitch
link |
00:59:17.240
and Jonathan Fritz, they organized a particular section
link |
00:59:20.920
on this conference in Virginia.
link |
00:59:23.400
And this is the first time I was in the room
link |
00:59:25.520
with so many neuroscientists
link |
00:59:27.760
studying the neurobiology of dance.
link |
00:59:29.360
It's a new field now in the last five years.
link |
00:59:32.200
And there was one lab where they were putting EEG electrodes
link |
00:59:39.040
on the dancers, on two different dancers
link |
00:59:42.400
partnering with each other,
link |
00:59:44.080
as well as the audience seeing the dance.
link |
00:59:49.080
And some argued, okay,
link |
00:59:51.240
if you're listening to the music as well,
link |
00:59:52.840
how are you responding?
link |
00:59:53.680
Because you're asking a question about music
link |
00:59:55.800
and I'm giving you an answer about dance.
link |
00:59:58.120
And what they found is that the dancers,
link |
01:00:02.360
when they resonated with each other during the dance
link |
01:00:04.720
or the audience listening to the dancers and the music,
link |
01:00:07.840
there's some resonance going on there
link |
01:00:09.760
that they score as higher resonance.
link |
01:00:13.160
Their brain activity with these wireless EEG signals
link |
01:00:16.520
are showing something different.
link |
01:00:18.240
And so that's why I say possible yet.
link |
01:00:19.960
It needs more rigorous study.
link |
01:00:23.240
And this is some stuff they publish,
link |
01:00:25.760
but it's not prime time yet,
link |
01:00:27.480
but they're trying to figure this out.
link |
01:00:29.440
I love it.
link |
01:00:30.280
So at least if I can't dance well,
link |
01:00:32.360
maybe I can hear and feel what it is
link |
01:00:35.200
to dance in a certain way.
link |
01:00:36.680
That's right.
link |
01:00:37.720
And this will be, some people will think that they,
link |
01:00:41.680
even songs that they hear
link |
01:00:43.800
and they can almost sing to themselves in their own head
link |
01:00:47.000
and they know what they want it to sound like.
link |
01:00:49.640
And you know what it really sounds good,
link |
01:00:51.280
what it sounds like,
link |
01:00:52.640
but they can't get their voice to do it.
link |
01:00:55.520
I'm raising, for those listening, I'm raising my hand.
link |
01:00:58.360
No musical ability.
link |
01:01:00.160
Others in my household have tremendous musical ability
link |
01:01:03.360
with instruments and with voice, but not me.
link |
01:01:06.920
And so this is one of my selfish goals
link |
01:01:11.800
of trying to find the genetics
link |
01:01:13.800
of why can some people sing really well and some not?
link |
01:01:18.200
Is there some genetic predisposition to that?
link |
01:01:20.760
And then can I modify my own muscles
link |
01:01:22.920
or brain circuits to sing better?
link |
01:01:24.480
You're still after the sing.
link |
01:01:26.080
I guess this is what happens
link |
01:01:27.040
when siblings vary in proficiency
link |
01:01:30.800
is that that competitiveness
link |
01:01:32.280
amongst brothers and sisters never goes away.
link |
01:01:34.840
I've been trying to breathe
link |
01:01:35.680
as good as my brother, Mark and Victor,
link |
01:01:38.240
for the rest of my entire life.
link |
01:01:40.400
Watch out, Mark and Victor.
link |
01:01:41.480
He's coming for you with neuroscience
link |
01:01:43.440
from the vacuum.
link |
01:01:45.000
Earlier, you said that you discovered that you could dance.
link |
01:01:49.040
That caught my ear.
link |
01:01:51.360
It sounds like you didn't actually have to,
link |
01:01:52.960
I'm not suggesting you didn't work hard at it,
link |
01:01:54.880
but that at the moment where you discovered it,
link |
01:01:57.560
it just sort of was a skill that you had
link |
01:02:00.280
that up until that point,
link |
01:02:01.920
you didn't target a life in the world of dance.
link |
01:02:06.120
But the fact that you, quote unquote,
link |
01:02:08.160
discovered that you could dance really well
link |
01:02:10.160
and then went to this incredible school of dance
link |
01:02:11.920
and did well tells me that perhaps there is an ability
link |
01:02:16.400
that was built up in childhood
link |
01:02:18.760
and or that perhaps we do all have
link |
01:02:21.560
different genetic leanings for different motor functions.
link |
01:02:24.920
Yeah.
link |
01:02:25.920
Well, for me, both explanations could be possible.
link |
01:02:29.320
For the first, I grew up in a family
link |
01:02:32.280
listening to Motown songs,
link |
01:02:34.520
dancing at parties and so forth, family parties,
link |
01:02:39.360
an African-American family, basically.
link |
01:02:41.560
And so I grew up dancing from a young child,
link |
01:02:48.440
but this discovery, you know,
link |
01:02:51.520
maybe dancing even more so in terms of a talent,
link |
01:02:57.600
the genetic component, if it really exists, I don't know.
link |
01:03:00.680
You know, with my 23andMe results,
link |
01:03:03.760
it says I have the genetic substitutions
link |
01:03:07.840
that are associated with high-intensity athletes
link |
01:03:11.480
and fast-twitch muscles.
link |
01:03:13.200
And who knows?
link |
01:03:14.200
Maybe that could have something to do with me
link |
01:03:16.480
being able to synchronize my body to rhythmic sounds.
link |
01:03:23.240
Maybe, maybe better than some others.
link |
01:03:26.480
It turns out that my genetics also show
link |
01:03:28.960
that I have a genetic substitute
link |
01:03:31.400
that makes it hard for me to sing on pitch.
link |
01:03:34.720
And so that does correlate with my, you know,
link |
01:03:37.120
even though I can sing on this pitch,
link |
01:03:38.320
especially if I hear a piano or, you know, kind of playing it
link |
01:03:41.680
but, you know, maybe that's why my siblings, you know,
link |
01:03:44.760
who didn't have that genetic predisposition
link |
01:03:47.120
in his 23andMe results, you know,
link |
01:03:49.680
could go along with the genetic component as well.
link |
01:03:52.720
I'm imagining family gatherings with 23andMe data
link |
01:03:56.280
and intense arguments about it.
link |
01:03:58.400
Innate and learned ability, fun.
link |
01:04:01.320
Love to be an attendant.
link |
01:04:03.000
I'm not inviting myself to your Thanksgiving dinner,
link |
01:04:05.000
by the way, but I suppose I am.
link |
01:04:07.280
You're welcome to.
link |
01:04:08.120
Thank you.
link |
01:04:09.280
I'll bring my 23andMe data.
link |
01:04:11.520
I'd love to chat a moment about facial expression
link |
01:04:14.680
because that's a form of motor pattern that, you know,
link |
01:04:17.160
I think for most people out there,
link |
01:04:20.360
just think about smiling and frowning,
link |
01:04:22.360
but there are of course, you know, thousands,
link |
01:04:24.480
if not millions of micro expressions and things of that sort,
link |
01:04:28.640
many of which are subconscious.
link |
01:04:31.000
And we're all familiar with the fact
link |
01:04:33.800
that when what somebody says
link |
01:04:36.280
doesn't match some specific feature
link |
01:04:38.440
of their facial expression, that it can call, you know,
link |
01:04:42.520
that mismatch can cue our attention,
link |
01:04:45.200
especially among people that know each other very well.
link |
01:04:47.920
Like somebody will say, well, you said that,
link |
01:04:50.440
but your right eye twitched to the, you know,
link |
01:04:53.560
a little bit in a way that tells me
link |
01:04:55.360
that you didn't really mean that, these kinds of things.
link |
01:04:57.680
Or in the opposite example,
link |
01:05:01.800
when the emotionality and the content of our speech
link |
01:05:05.040
is matched to a facial expression,
link |
01:05:07.200
there's something that's just so wonderful about that
link |
01:05:11.200
because it seems like everything's aligned.
link |
01:05:13.520
So how does the motor circuitry
link |
01:05:16.240
that controls facial expression
link |
01:05:18.000
map onto the brain circuits that control language, speech,
link |
01:05:21.960
and even bodily and hand movements?
link |
01:05:24.160
You ask a great question
link |
01:05:26.080
because we both know some colleagues like Winrich Freiwald
link |
01:05:29.120
at Rockefeller University,
link |
01:05:30.600
who study facial expression and the neurobiology behind it.
link |
01:05:33.760
And now we both share some students that were co-mentoring
link |
01:05:37.520
and talk about this same question that you brought up.
link |
01:05:41.320
And what I'm learning a lot is that non-human primates
link |
01:05:45.200
have a lot of diversity in their facial expression
link |
01:05:47.720
like we humans do.
link |
01:05:49.120
And what we know about the neurobiology
link |
01:05:52.160
of brain regions controlling those muscles of the face
link |
01:05:55.600
is that these non-human primates and some other species
link |
01:05:58.240
that don't learn how to imitate vocalizations,
link |
01:06:00.720
they have strong connections from the cortical regions
link |
01:06:05.760
to the motor neurons that control facial expressions,
link |
01:06:09.320
but absent connections or weak connections
link |
01:06:12.400
to the motor neurons that control the voice.
link |
01:06:14.720
So I think our diverse facial expression,
link |
01:06:18.920
even though it's more diverse than these non-human primates,
link |
01:06:21.000
there was already a pre-existing diversity of communication,
link |
01:06:25.640
whether it's intentional or unconscious
link |
01:06:28.040
through facial expression in our ancestors.
link |
01:06:31.360
And on top of that, we humans now add the voice
link |
01:06:35.760
along with those facial expressions.
link |
01:06:38.080
I see.
link |
01:06:39.720
And in terms of language learning when we're kids,
link |
01:06:42.760
I mean, children fortunately are not told
link |
01:06:45.200
to fake their expressions or to smile
link |
01:06:47.000
when they say I'm happy.
link |
01:06:49.360
So at some point, everybody learns for better or for worse
link |
01:06:52.960
how to untangle these different components
link |
01:06:57.240
of hand movement, body posture,
link |
01:06:59.720
speech, and facial expression.
link |
01:07:02.080
But in their best form, I would say,
link |
01:07:05.680
assuming that the best form is always,
link |
01:07:07.440
I guess there are instances where, for safety reasons,
link |
01:07:10.040
one might need to feign some of these aspects of language.
link |
01:07:13.920
But in most cases, when those are aligned,
link |
01:07:16.720
it seems like that could reflect
link |
01:07:19.040
that all the different circuitries
link |
01:07:20.720
are operating in parallel,
link |
01:07:22.320
but that the ability to misalign these
link |
01:07:25.480
is also a powerful aspect to our maturation.
link |
01:07:29.920
I even think of theater, for instance,
link |
01:07:31.840
where deliberate disentangling of these areas is important,
link |
01:07:36.720
but also we know when an actor, when it feels real,
link |
01:07:41.000
and when it looks like, when bad acting is oftentimes
link |
01:07:44.520
when the facial expression or body posture
link |
01:07:46.480
just doesn't quite match what we're hearing.
link |
01:07:48.760
So are these skills that people that learn and acquire
link |
01:07:53.240
according to adaptability and profession,
link |
01:07:55.200
or do you think that all children
link |
01:07:57.840
and all adults eventually learn
link |
01:07:59.320
how to couple and uncouple these circuits a little bit?
link |
01:08:02.440
Yeah, I think it's this similar argument
link |
01:08:05.240
I mentioned earlier about the innate
link |
01:08:07.480
and the learned for the vocalizations.
link |
01:08:09.680
And by the way, when I say we humans have facial expressions
link |
01:08:12.720
associated with our vocalizations
link |
01:08:14.640
in a different way than primates, non-human primates,
link |
01:08:17.040
it's the learned vocalizations I'm talking about.
link |
01:08:19.600
So there is a common view out there
link |
01:08:23.680
that facial expressions in non-human species,
link |
01:08:26.440
like non-human primates, or you can have them in birds too,
link |
01:08:30.240
are innate, all right?
link |
01:08:33.480
And so they're reflexive controlled.
link |
01:08:36.240
I don't believe that.
link |
01:08:37.080
I think there's some learned component to it,
link |
01:08:38.880
and I think we have more learning component to it as well,
link |
01:08:41.880
but we also have an innate component.
link |
01:08:44.880
And so if you try to put your hands behind your back
link |
01:08:48.040
and hold your fists, or even just not,
link |
01:08:49.920
and try to speak and try to communicate,
link |
01:08:52.440
it's actually harder to do.
link |
01:08:53.760
You have to force yourself or put it by your side.
link |
01:08:56.920
This comes naturally.
link |
01:08:58.360
Facial expressions comes naturally
link |
01:08:59.880
because there is an innate component.
link |
01:09:01.880
And yes, you have to learn how to dissociate the two,
link |
01:09:06.320
communicate something angry with your hands
link |
01:09:08.400
or with your face, but politely with your voice.
link |
01:09:13.600
It's very hard to separate at those two
link |
01:09:16.320
because there is that innate component
link |
01:09:18.320
that brings them together.
link |
01:09:21.160
So it's like an email too.
link |
01:09:22.400
You're emailing and someone says something by email.
link |
01:09:25.680
Someone can interpret that angrily or gently,
link |
01:09:30.400
and it becomes ambiguous.
link |
01:09:32.680
The facial expressions get rid of that ambiguity.
link |
01:09:35.640
I'm so glad you brought that out
link |
01:09:37.040
because my next question was and is about written language.
link |
01:09:41.320
The first question I'll ask is when you write,
link |
01:09:44.120
either type or write things out by hand,
link |
01:09:46.760
do you hear the content of what you want to write
link |
01:09:51.760
in your head, just you personally?
link |
01:09:54.480
Yes, I do.
link |
01:09:55.640
Yeah, and I know that I do
link |
01:09:59.440
because I was trying to figure out a debate about this issue
link |
01:10:03.400
and trying to resolve the debate
link |
01:10:05.920
with my own self-experimentation on me.
link |
01:10:09.000
I ask that because a quite well-known colleague of ours,
link |
01:10:12.600
Carl Deisseroth at Stanford,
link |
01:10:14.560
who's been on this podcast and is of optogenetics fame
link |
01:10:17.400
and psychiatry fame, et cetera.
link |
01:10:19.120
I know him.
link |
01:10:19.960
Yeah, he sends his regards.
link |
01:10:21.480
And told me that his practice for writing
link |
01:10:27.280
and for thinking involves a quite painful process
link |
01:10:32.320
of forcing himself to sit completely still
link |
01:10:36.200
and think in complete sentences,
link |
01:10:38.360
to force thinking in complete sentences.
link |
01:10:40.320
And when he told me that, I decided to try this exercise
link |
01:10:42.800
and it's quite difficult.
link |
01:10:43.920
First of all, it's difficult for the reason
link |
01:10:45.400
that you mentioned, which is that with many thoughts,
link |
01:10:48.360
I want to look around
link |
01:10:49.440
and I start to gesticulate with my hands.
link |
01:10:52.120
So there it is again,
link |
01:10:53.040
the connection between language and hand movement,
link |
01:10:55.680
even if one isn't speaking.
link |
01:10:58.440
And the other part that's challenging
link |
01:11:01.480
is I realized that while we write in complete sentences,
link |
01:11:05.160
most of the time, we'll talk about how that's changing now
link |
01:11:08.200
and texting, et cetera,
link |
01:11:10.160
that we don't often think in complete sentences
link |
01:11:14.600
and specifically in simple declarative sentences,
link |
01:11:18.760
that a lot of our thoughts would be,
link |
01:11:20.760
if they were written out onto a page,
link |
01:11:23.320
would look pretty much like passive language
link |
01:11:27.320
that a good copy editor or a good editor would say,
link |
01:11:30.360
oh, like we need to cross this out,
link |
01:11:31.920
make this simple and declarative.
link |
01:11:33.640
So what I'm getting at here is what is the process
link |
01:11:36.920
of going from a thought to language to written word?
link |
01:11:42.160
And I also wanted to touch on handwritten versus typed,
link |
01:11:46.920
but thought to language to written word,
link |
01:11:49.680
what's going on there?
link |
01:11:50.720
What do we know about the neural circuitry?
link |
01:11:53.080
And I was gonna ask, why is it so hard?
link |
01:11:55.480
But now I want to ask, why is this even possible?
link |
01:11:58.760
It seems like a very challenging
link |
01:12:00.600
neural computational problem.
link |
01:12:02.240
Yeah, yeah.
link |
01:12:03.680
And coming from the linguistic world
link |
01:12:07.840
and even just the regular neurobiology world,
link |
01:12:10.080
going back to something I said before
link |
01:12:11.600
is about a separate language module in the brain.
link |
01:12:14.560
There was this thought or hypothesis
link |
01:12:16.720
that this language module
link |
01:12:18.560
has all these complex algorithms to them,
link |
01:12:21.680
and they're signaling to the speech circuit,
link |
01:12:24.480
how to produce the sounds,
link |
01:12:26.440
the hand circuit, how to write them or gesture,
link |
01:12:30.240
the visual pathway on how to interpret them from reading,
link |
01:12:34.360
and the auditory pathway for listening.
link |
01:12:37.280
I don't think that's the case, all right?
link |
01:12:39.920
And that this thinking
link |
01:12:41.160
where there's this internal speech going on,
link |
01:12:43.880
what I think is going on
link |
01:12:45.600
is to explain what you're asking is about,
link |
01:12:49.000
that I'm gonna take it from the perspective
link |
01:12:50.480
of reading something.
link |
01:12:51.680
You read something on a paper,
link |
01:12:53.800
the signal from the paper goes through your eyes,
link |
01:12:56.760
it goes to the back of your brain
link |
01:12:58.080
to your visual cortical regions eventually,
link |
01:13:01.480
and then you now got to interpret that signal
link |
01:13:04.080
in your visual pathway of what you're reading.
link |
01:13:07.120
How are you gonna do that in terms of speech?
link |
01:13:09.280
That visual signal then goes to your speech pathway
link |
01:13:12.720
in the motor cortex in front here in Broca's area,
link |
01:13:15.760
and you silently speak what you read in your brain
link |
01:13:19.480
without moving your muscles.
link |
01:13:21.320
And sometimes, actually, if you put electrodes,
link |
01:13:24.080
EMG electrodes on your laryngeal muscles,
link |
01:13:28.960
even on birds, you can do this,
link |
01:13:30.560
you'll see activity there while reading
link |
01:13:33.880
or trying to speak silently,
link |
01:13:36.400
even though no sound's coming out.
link |
01:13:38.520
And so your speech pathway is now speaking
link |
01:13:43.680
what you're reading.
link |
01:13:45.520
Now, to finish it off,
link |
01:13:47.560
that signal is sent to your auditory pathway
link |
01:13:49.800
so you can hear what you're speaking in your own head.
link |
01:13:53.280
That's incredible.
link |
01:13:54.120
And this is why it's complicated,
link |
01:13:56.120
because you're using like three different pathways,
link |
01:13:59.160
the visual, the speaking motor one,
link |
01:14:01.360
and the auditory to read.
link |
01:14:04.160
Oh, and then you gotta write, right?
link |
01:14:06.880
Okay, here comes the fourth one.
link |
01:14:08.680
Now the hand area's next to your speech pathway
link |
01:14:11.480
has gotta take that auditory signal
link |
01:14:13.280
or even the adjacent motor signals for speaking
link |
01:14:16.120
and translate it into a visual signal on paper.
link |
01:14:19.320
So you're using at least four brain circuits,
link |
01:14:23.440
which includes the speech production
link |
01:14:25.480
and the speech perception pathways to write.
link |
01:14:28.400
Incredible.
link |
01:14:29.560
And finally explains to me why,
link |
01:14:33.040
so I was weaned teaching undergraduates,
link |
01:14:35.720
graduate students, and medical students.
link |
01:14:37.200
And I've observed that when I'm teaching,
link |
01:14:40.560
I have to stop speaking
link |
01:14:42.000
if I'm going to write something on the board.
link |
01:14:44.280
I just have to stop all speaking completely.
link |
01:14:46.960
It turns out this is an advantage to catch
link |
01:14:49.120
because it allows me to catch my voice.
link |
01:14:51.360
It allows me to slow down a bit,
link |
01:14:53.880
breathe and inhale some oxygen and so on,
link |
01:14:56.440
because I tend to speak quickly
link |
01:14:57.680
if I'm not writing something out.
link |
01:14:59.840
So there's a break in the circuitry for me,
link |
01:15:02.040
or at least they are distinct enough
link |
01:15:03.640
that I have to stop and then write something.
link |
01:15:06.480
Yes, that does imply competing brain circuits
link |
01:15:10.360
for your conscious attention.
link |
01:15:13.880
We have colleagues up at Columbia Med
link |
01:15:16.920
who are known at least in our circles
link |
01:15:20.000
for voice dictating their papers,
link |
01:15:22.560
not writing them out,
link |
01:15:23.600
but just speaking into a voice recorder.
link |
01:15:26.240
I've written papers that way.
link |
01:15:27.720
It doesn't feel quite as natural for me
link |
01:15:31.440
as writing things out,
link |
01:15:32.880
but not because I can go quickly
link |
01:15:34.760
from thought to language to typing.
link |
01:15:36.880
I type reasonably fast.
link |
01:15:38.240
I can touch type now.
link |
01:15:39.320
I don't think I ever taught my,
link |
01:15:40.600
I think I taught myself.
link |
01:15:41.600
I never took a touch typing course,
link |
01:15:43.200
but it just sort of happened now.
link |
01:15:44.440
My motor system seems to know where the keys are
link |
01:15:47.360
with enough accuracy that it works.
link |
01:15:53.040
This is remarkable to me that any of us can do this,
link |
01:15:56.280
but when it comes to writing,
link |
01:15:59.320
what I've found is that if my rate of thought
link |
01:16:02.960
and my rate of writing are aligned nicely,
link |
01:16:06.080
things go well.
link |
01:16:08.000
However, if I'm thinking much faster than I can write,
link |
01:16:11.400
that's a problem.
link |
01:16:12.720
And certainly if I'm thinking more slowly
link |
01:16:15.160
than I want to write,
link |
01:16:16.200
that's also a problem.
link |
01:16:17.920
And the solution for me has been to write with a pen.
link |
01:16:21.480
I'm in love with these,
link |
01:16:22.520
and I have no relationship to the company,
link |
01:16:24.480
at least not now,
link |
01:16:25.320
although if they want to work with us,
link |
01:16:27.840
I love these Pilot V5, V7s,
link |
01:16:29.840
because not necessarily because of the ink or the feel,
link |
01:16:33.600
although I like that as well,
link |
01:16:34.600
but because of the rate that it allows me to write.
link |
01:16:37.240
They write very well slowly
link |
01:16:38.560
and they write very well quickly.
link |
01:16:40.480
And so I have this theory supported only
link |
01:16:44.720
by my own ANIC data, no peer-reviewed study,
link |
01:16:48.240
that writing by hand is fundamentally different
link |
01:16:53.280
than typing out information.
link |
01:16:55.720
Is there any evidence that this motor pathway for writing
link |
01:17:00.800
is better or somehow different
link |
01:17:04.400
than the motor pathway for typing?
link |
01:17:06.920
Yeah, that's interesting.
link |
01:17:09.360
And I don't know of any studies,
link |
01:17:11.720
I have my own personal experience as well,
link |
01:17:13.480
but trying to put this into the context,
link |
01:17:16.200
if I had to design an experiment
link |
01:17:19.280
to test the hypothesis here,
link |
01:17:21.240
to explain your experience in mind,
link |
01:17:23.680
is that writing by hand, I would argue,
link |
01:17:28.760
requires a different set of less skills with the fingers
link |
01:17:33.800
than typing.
link |
01:17:35.080
So you have to coordinate your fingers
link |
01:17:37.720
more in opposite directions and so forth with typing,
link |
01:17:42.720
but also writing by hand requires more arm movement.
link |
01:17:45.440
And so therefore, I would argue that the difficulty there
link |
01:17:53.400
could be in the types of muscles
link |
01:17:56.960
and the fine motor control you need of those muscles
link |
01:17:59.680
along with speaking in your brain at the same time.
link |
01:18:02.040
So basically I'm coarse, I'm a brute,
link |
01:18:03.920
and so it makes sense that a more primitive writing device
link |
01:18:07.000
would work.
link |
01:18:07.840
That's right, yes.
link |
01:18:08.680
But let me add to this in terms of the,
link |
01:18:12.480
in my own personal experience, right,
link |
01:18:14.560
what I find is I can write something faster by hand
link |
01:18:22.000
for a short period of time compared to typing.
link |
01:18:25.160
And that is because I think I run out of the energy
link |
01:18:28.360
in my arm movements faster than I run out of muscle energy
link |
01:18:32.400
in my finger movements.
link |
01:18:35.160
And I think it takes a longer time for us to write words
link |
01:18:39.120
with our fingers because, and in terms of the speech.
link |
01:18:43.400
So I think you're writing, whether it's by hand or typing,
link |
01:18:47.640
and your speech, it only will align very well
link |
01:18:51.280
if you can type as fast as you can speak
link |
01:18:54.120
or write as fast as you can speak in your head.
link |
01:18:56.200
I love it.
link |
01:18:57.040
So what you've done, if I understand correctly,
link |
01:18:59.000
is created a bridge between thought and writing,
link |
01:19:02.320
and that bridge is speech.
link |
01:19:04.320
That bridge is speech, that's right, that's right.
link |
01:19:07.400
When you're writing something out,
link |
01:19:08.720
you're speaking it to yourself.
link |
01:19:10.760
And if you're speaking faster than you can type,
link |
01:19:13.440
you got a problem.
link |
01:19:15.400
Interesting.
link |
01:19:16.240
I do a number of podcast episodes
link |
01:19:18.560
that are not with guests, but solo episodes.
link |
01:19:20.400
And as listeners know, these are very long episodes,
link |
01:19:22.720
often two or more hours.
link |
01:19:24.600
And we joke around the podcast studio
link |
01:19:27.600
that I will get locked into a mode of speech
link |
01:19:30.560
where some of it is more elaborative and anecdotal,
link |
01:19:34.320
and then I'll punch out simple declarative sentences.
link |
01:19:38.480
I find it very hard to switch from one module to the next.
link |
01:19:42.080
The thing that I have done
link |
01:19:43.920
in order to make that transition more fluid
link |
01:19:47.400
and prep for those podcast episodes
link |
01:19:49.920
is actually to read the lyrics of songs
link |
01:19:53.440
and to sing them in my head
link |
01:19:55.720
as a way of warming up my vocal cords.
link |
01:19:57.720
But luckily for those around me,
link |
01:20:00.440
when I do that, I'm not actually singing out loud.
link |
01:20:03.720
And so what you're telling me supports this idea
link |
01:20:08.160
that even when we are imagining singing
link |
01:20:12.120
or writing in our mind, we are exercising our vocal cords.
link |
01:20:16.480
You're actually getting little low potentials
link |
01:20:19.800
of electrical currents reaching your muscles there,
link |
01:20:22.760
which also means you're exercising
link |
01:20:24.200
your speech brain circuits too,
link |
01:20:25.560
without actually going with the flow of activity
link |
01:20:28.960
in the muscles.
link |
01:20:29.960
Incredible.
link |
01:20:30.800
Yes.
link |
01:20:31.640
And this idea of singing helps you as well.
link |
01:20:36.000
Even with Parkinson's patients and so forth,
link |
01:20:38.080
when they want to say something,
link |
01:20:39.040
singing or listening to music helps them move better.
link |
01:20:41.280
And the idea there is that the brain circuits for singing,
link |
01:20:45.160
or let's say the function of the brain circuits for speech
link |
01:20:47.960
being used for singing first is the more ancestral trait.
link |
01:20:51.480
And that's why it's easier to do things with singing
link |
01:20:54.280
sometimes than it is with speaking.
link |
01:20:56.240
I love it.
link |
01:20:58.160
Stutter is a particularly interesting case
link |
01:21:02.280
and one that every once in a while,
link |
01:21:04.520
I'll get questions about this from our audience.
link |
01:21:08.360
Stutter is complicated in a number of ways,
link |
01:21:11.120
but culturally, in my understanding from these emails
link |
01:21:14.560
that I receive is that stutter can often cause people
link |
01:21:18.160
to hide and speak less because it can be embarrassing.
link |
01:21:22.000
And we are often not patient with stutter.
link |
01:21:25.160
We also have the assumption that if somebody's stuttering,
link |
01:21:27.560
that their thinking is slow,
link |
01:21:28.600
but it turns out there are many examples historically
link |
01:21:31.440
of people who could not speak well,
link |
01:21:33.160
but who were brilliant thinkers.
link |
01:21:36.400
I don't know how well they could write,
link |
01:21:37.920
but they found other modes of communication.
link |
01:21:41.360
I realize that you're not a speech pathologist
link |
01:21:44.040
or therapist, but what is the current neurobiological
link |
01:21:48.240
understanding of stutter and what's being developed
link |
01:21:51.920
in terms of treatments for stutter?
link |
01:21:53.560
Yeah, so we actually accidentally came across
link |
01:21:58.480
stuttering in songbirds
link |
01:22:00.280
and we've published several papers on this.
link |
01:22:03.000
So try to figure out the neurobiological basis.
link |
01:22:04.920
The first study we had was a brain area
link |
01:22:08.400
called the basal ganglia or the striatum part
link |
01:22:11.640
of the basal ganglia involved in coordinating movements,
link |
01:22:14.880
learning how to make movements.
link |
01:22:16.840
When it was damaged in a speech-like pathway in these birds,
link |
01:22:22.080
what we found is that they started to stutter
link |
01:22:25.240
as the brain region recovered.
link |
01:22:28.080
And unlike humans, they actually recovered
link |
01:22:31.880
after three or four months.
link |
01:22:33.760
And why is that the case?
link |
01:22:34.880
Because bird brains undergoes new neurogenesis
link |
01:22:38.120
in a way that human or mammal brains don't.
link |
01:22:41.800
And it was the new neurons that were coming in
link |
01:22:45.000
into the circuit, but not quite
link |
01:22:47.880
with the right proper activity was resulting
link |
01:22:51.440
in this stuttering in these birds.
link |
01:22:54.480
And after it was repaired, not exactly the old song
link |
01:22:57.520
came back after the repair,
link |
01:22:59.800
but still it recovered a lot better.
link |
01:23:02.360
And it's now known, they call this neurogenics stuttering
link |
01:23:07.400
in humans, damage to the basal ganglia
link |
01:23:10.480
or some type of disruption to the basal ganglia
link |
01:23:13.280
at a young age also causes stuttering in humans.
link |
01:23:16.640
And even those who are born with stuttering,
link |
01:23:21.520
it's often the basal ganglia that's disrupted
link |
01:23:24.920
in some other brain circuit.
link |
01:23:26.480
And we think the speech part of the basal ganglia.
link |
01:23:29.440
Can adults who maintain a stutter from childhood
link |
01:23:32.960
repair that stutter?
link |
01:23:34.400
They can repair it with a therapy,
link |
01:23:36.760
with learning how to speak slower,
link |
01:23:39.280
learning how to tap out a rhythm during such.
link |
01:23:41.960
And yeah, I'm not a speech pathologist,
link |
01:23:43.720
but I started reading this literature
link |
01:23:45.600
and talking to others that, you know,
link |
01:23:47.960
colleagues who actually study stuttering.
link |
01:23:50.440
So yes, there are ways to overcome the stuttering
link |
01:23:54.880
through behavioral therapy.
link |
01:23:59.720
And I think all of the tools out there
link |
01:24:04.120
have something to do with sensory motor integration.
link |
01:24:07.760
Controlling what you hear with what you output
link |
01:24:11.320
in a thoughtful controlled way helps reduce the stuttering.
link |
01:24:15.920
There are a couple examples from real life
link |
01:24:17.640
that I want to touch on.
link |
01:24:18.600
And one is somewhat facetious,
link |
01:24:20.800
but now I realize is a serious neurobiological issue.
link |
01:24:26.240
Serious meaning, I think, interesting,
link |
01:24:28.640
which is that every once in a while
link |
01:24:31.160
I will have a conversation with somebody
link |
01:24:33.160
who says the last word of the sentence along with me.
link |
01:24:37.080
And it seems annoying in some instances,
link |
01:24:40.840
but I'm guessing this is just a breakthrough
link |
01:24:42.920
of the motor pattern
link |
01:24:43.880
that they're hearing what I'm saying very well.
link |
01:24:46.320
So I'm going to interpret this kindly
link |
01:24:47.800
and think they're hearing what I'm saying.
link |
01:24:50.040
They're literally hearing it in their mind
link |
01:24:53.560
and they're getting that low level electrical activity
link |
01:24:56.520
to their throat.
link |
01:24:57.400
And they're just joining me in the enunciation
link |
01:25:01.240
of what I'm saying, probably without realizing it.
link |
01:25:04.680
Can we assume that that might be the case?
link |
01:25:06.240
Well, I wouldn't be surprised.
link |
01:25:08.320
So the motor theory of speech perception
link |
01:25:10.800
where this idea originally came,
link |
01:25:12.080
what you hear is going through your speech circuit
link |
01:25:15.440
and then also activating those muscles slightly.
link |
01:25:18.280
So yes, so one might argue,
link |
01:25:23.280
okay, is that speech circuit now interpreting
link |
01:25:26.040
what that person is speaking now you listening to me
link |
01:25:29.160
and is going to finish it off
link |
01:25:30.600
because it's already going through their brain
link |
01:25:33.520
and they can predict it.
link |
01:25:34.440
That would be one theory.
link |
01:25:36.760
I don't think the verdict out there is no, but that's one.
link |
01:25:39.640
The other is synchronizing turn-taking in the conversation
link |
01:25:44.640
where you're acknowledging that we understand each other
link |
01:25:49.640
by finishing off what I say.
link |
01:25:53.000
And it's almost like a social bonding kind of thing.
link |
01:25:56.200
The other could be, I want the person to shut out
link |
01:25:58.520
so I can speak as well and take that turn.
link |
01:26:00.920
And each pair of people have a rhythm to their conversation.
link |
01:26:05.920
And if you have somebody who's overtalkative
link |
01:26:08.160
versus undertalkative or vice versa,
link |
01:26:10.520
that rhythm can be lost in them finishing off
link |
01:26:13.360
and going back and forth.
link |
01:26:14.840
But I think having something to do with turn-taking as well
link |
01:26:18.840
makes a lot of sense.
link |
01:26:20.240
I have a colleague at Stanford who says
link |
01:26:22.640
that interruption is a sign of interest.
link |
01:26:25.640
I'm not sure that everyone agrees.
link |
01:26:27.160
I think it's highly contextual,
link |
01:26:28.960
but there is this form of a verbal nod
link |
01:26:32.360
of saying, or things of that sort.
link |
01:26:34.360
And there are many of these,
link |
01:26:36.600
and I'm often told by my audience
link |
01:26:38.720
that I'd interrupt my guests and things of that sort.
link |
01:26:41.120
Oftentimes I'll just get caught in the natural flow
link |
01:26:43.440
of the conversation.
link |
01:26:44.840
But-
link |
01:26:45.680
Well, I think we've had pretty good turn-taking here,
link |
01:26:48.000
I hope.
link |
01:26:48.840
That's so far, so good.
link |
01:26:49.680
I feel that way.
link |
01:26:50.520
I'm glad you feel that way,
link |
01:26:51.360
because especially in the context of a discussion
link |
01:26:53.280
about language, this seems important.
link |
01:26:57.520
Texting is a very, very interesting evolution of language,
link |
01:27:03.920
because what you've told us is that we have a thought,
link |
01:27:07.840
it's translated into one word,
link |
01:27:10.400
translated into language.
link |
01:27:11.880
It might not be complete sentences, but texting,
link |
01:27:14.640
I have to imagine this is the first time
link |
01:27:16.120
in human evolution where we've written with our thumbs.
link |
01:27:18.960
So I don't know, it seems more primitive to me
link |
01:27:21.560
than typing with fingers around your hands,
link |
01:27:23.040
but hey, who am I to judge the evolution of our species
link |
01:27:26.120
in one direction or the other?
link |
01:27:27.760
But the shorthand, often grammatically deficient,
link |
01:27:33.520
incomplete sentence form of texting
link |
01:27:36.320
is an incredible thing to see.
link |
01:27:38.160
Early in relationships, romantic relationships,
link |
01:27:41.280
people will often evaluate the other's text
link |
01:27:44.240
and their ability to use proper grammar
link |
01:27:47.080
and spelling, et cetera.
link |
01:27:48.480
This often quickly degrades,
link |
01:27:50.640
and there's an acceptance
link |
01:27:51.840
that we're just trying to communicate through shorthand.
link |
01:27:54.320
Almost military-like shorthand,
link |
01:27:57.880
but with internally consistent between people,
link |
01:28:00.680
but there's no general consensus of what things mean.
link |
01:28:02.920
But WTFs and OMGs and all sorts of things.
link |
01:28:09.360
I wonder sometimes whether or not
link |
01:28:11.360
we are getting less proficient at speech
link |
01:28:14.800
because we are not required
link |
01:28:17.160
to write and think in complete sentences.
link |
01:28:21.720
I'm not being judgmental here.
link |
01:28:22.920
I see this in my colleagues.
link |
01:28:24.360
I see this in myself.
link |
01:28:25.960
This is not a judgment of the younger generation.
link |
01:28:28.980
I also know that slang has existed for decades,
link |
01:28:34.860
if not hundreds of years,
link |
01:28:36.340
but I also know that I don't speak the same way
link |
01:28:38.260
that I did when I was a teenager
link |
01:28:40.260
because I've suppressed a lot of that slang,
link |
01:28:42.340
not because it's inappropriate or offensive,
link |
01:28:45.300
although some of it was, frankly,
link |
01:28:48.140
but because it's out of context.
link |
01:28:50.540
So what do you think is happening to language?
link |
01:28:53.020
Are we getting better at speaking, worse at speaking?
link |
01:28:56.100
And what do you think the role of things like texting
link |
01:28:58.980
and tweeting and shorthand communication, hashtagging,
link |
01:29:02.820
what's that doing to the way that our brains work?
link |
01:29:05.300
Yeah, I think that one, in terms of
link |
01:29:11.540
measuring your level of sophistication and intelligence,
link |
01:29:14.320
and you say OMG, right?
link |
01:29:16.220
I think that also could be a cultural thing
link |
01:29:19.100
that, ah, you belong to the next generation.
link |
01:29:22.940
Or you're being cool.
link |
01:29:23.900
If you're an older person using OMG and other things
link |
01:29:27.540
that the younger generation would use.
link |
01:29:31.040
But if I really think about it clearly,
link |
01:29:36.340
texting actually has allowed
link |
01:29:39.320
for more rapid communication amongst people.
link |
01:29:43.340
I think without the invention of the phone before then,
link |
01:29:47.660
or texting back and forth,
link |
01:29:50.100
you had to wait days for a letter to show up.
link |
01:29:53.380
You couldn't call somebody on the phone and talk as well,
link |
01:29:55.900
you know, and so this rapid communication,
link |
01:29:57.820
but in terms of the rapid communication
link |
01:29:59.380
of writing in this case.
link |
01:30:01.580
So I think actually, it's more like a use it or lose it
link |
01:30:06.540
kind of a thing with the brain.
link |
01:30:10.140
The more you use a particular brain region or circuit,
link |
01:30:13.620
the more enhanced, it's like a muscle.
link |
01:30:16.320
The more you exercise it, the more healthier it is,
link |
01:30:19.120
the bigger it becomes and the more space it takes
link |
01:30:21.220
and the more you lose something else.
link |
01:30:23.420
So I think texting is not
link |
01:30:27.860
decreasing the speech prowess
link |
01:30:32.060
or the intellectual prowess of speech.
link |
01:30:34.260
It's converting it and using it a lot in a different way.
link |
01:30:38.980
In a way that may not be as rich in regular writing
link |
01:30:43.300
because you can only communicate so much nuance
link |
01:30:47.580
in short term writing.
link |
01:30:49.660
But whatever is being done,
link |
01:30:53.220
you got people texting hours and hours and hours
link |
01:30:55.700
on the phone.
link |
01:30:56.600
So whatever your thumb circuit
link |
01:30:58.980
is gonna get pretty big actually.
link |
01:31:02.060
I do wonder whether, you know,
link |
01:31:04.340
many people have lost their jobs based on tweets.
link |
01:31:08.140
The short latency between thought and action
link |
01:31:11.580
and distribution of one's thoughts is incredible.
link |
01:31:15.940
And I'm not just talking about people
link |
01:31:18.660
who apparently would have poor prefrontal top-down control.
link |
01:31:24.020
This is geek speak, by the way,
link |
01:31:25.300
for people that lack impulse control.
link |
01:31:27.380
But high-level academics,
link |
01:31:28.900
I'm not gonna point fingers at anyone,
link |
01:31:30.540
but examples of where you see these tweets
link |
01:31:33.380
and you go, what were they thinking?
link |
01:31:35.900
So presumably there's an optimal strategy
link |
01:31:39.860
between the thought, speech, motor pathway,
link |
01:31:44.420
especially when the motor pathway engages communication
link |
01:31:47.380
with hundreds of thousands of people.
link |
01:31:49.260
And retweets in particular,
link |
01:31:50.700
and the cut and paste function and the screenshot function
link |
01:31:53.300
are often the reason why speech propagates.
link |
01:31:55.780
Yep.
link |
01:31:56.620
So to me, it's a little eerie
link |
01:31:58.620
that just that the neural circuitry can do this
link |
01:32:04.420
and that we are catching up a little bit more slowly
link |
01:32:08.920
to the technology,
link |
01:32:10.220
and you've got these casualties of that mismatch.
link |
01:32:13.900
I think that's a good adjective to use,
link |
01:32:17.900
the casualties of what's going on.
link |
01:32:20.420
Because yes, it is the case with texting,
link |
01:32:23.380
what you're really losing there
link |
01:32:25.540
is less so the ability to write,
link |
01:32:28.380
but more the ability to interpret what is being written.
link |
01:32:32.060
And you can undeterpit something that somebody means.
link |
01:32:37.700
On the flip side of that,
link |
01:32:39.420
when if somebody's writing something very quick,
link |
01:32:42.520
they could be writing instinctually,
link |
01:32:46.120
more instinctually, their true meaning.
link |
01:32:49.280
And they don't have time to modify and color code
link |
01:32:53.400
what they're trying to say.
link |
01:32:55.080
And that's what they really feel
link |
01:32:57.960
as opposed to say in a more nuanced way.
link |
01:33:00.240
So I think both sides of that casualty are present.
link |
01:33:05.080
And that's a downturn, an unintended negative consequence
link |
01:33:10.080
of short word communication.
link |
01:33:14.720
Yeah, I agree that this whole phenomenon
link |
01:33:17.280
could be netting people that normally
link |
01:33:20.480
would only say these things out loud
link |
01:33:22.160
once inside the door of their own home or not at all.
link |
01:33:25.760
It's an interesting time that we're in
link |
01:33:28.160
vis-a-vis speech and language and motor patterns.
link |
01:33:30.800
So part of the human evolution for language.
link |
01:33:32.760
I think this is all part of our evolution.
link |
01:33:35.200
That's right.
link |
01:33:36.400
So for those of you thinking terrible thoughts,
link |
01:33:38.120
please put them in the world and be a casualty.
link |
01:33:40.040
And for those of you that are not,
link |
01:33:41.360
please be very careful with how proficient
link |
01:33:44.040
your thought to language to motor action goes.
link |
01:33:47.760
Maybe the technology companies should install some buffers,
link |
01:33:50.840
some AI-based buffers.
link |
01:33:52.480
Right, that's taking some EEG signals from your brain
link |
01:33:55.360
while you're texting to say,
link |
01:33:56.680
okay, this is not a great thought, slow down.
link |
01:34:00.840
Right, this doesn't reflect your best state.
link |
01:34:04.680
That brings me to what was going to be
link |
01:34:07.080
the next question anyway, which is,
link |
01:34:08.560
we are quickly moving toward a time
link |
01:34:10.720
where there will be an even faster transition
link |
01:34:15.080
from thought to speech to motor output
link |
01:34:18.440
and maybe won't require motor output.
link |
01:34:20.560
What I'm referring to here is some of the incredible work
link |
01:34:23.160
of our colleagues, Eddie Chang at UCSF
link |
01:34:25.360
and others who are taking paralyzed human beings
link |
01:34:29.400
and learning to translate the electrical signals
link |
01:34:32.320
of neurons in various areas,
link |
01:34:33.640
including speech and language areas
link |
01:34:35.360
to computer screens that type out
link |
01:34:37.280
what these people are thinking.
link |
01:34:38.240
In other words, paralyzed people
link |
01:34:39.360
can put their thoughts into writing.
link |
01:34:42.160
That's a pretty extreme and wonderful example
link |
01:34:45.000
of recovery of function that is sure to continue to evolve.
link |
01:34:50.160
But I think we are headed toward a time
link |
01:34:52.640
not too long from now where my thoughts
link |
01:34:55.960
can be translated into words on a page
link |
01:34:58.360
if I allow that to happen.
link |
01:35:00.280
Yeah, so, and Eddie Chang's work,
link |
01:35:02.800
which I admire quite a bit and cite in my papers,
link |
01:35:07.200
I think he's really one of those at the leading edge
link |
01:35:10.160
of trying to understand within humans
link |
01:35:13.480
the neurobiology of speech.
link |
01:35:15.600
And he may not say it directly,
link |
01:35:17.680
but I talked to him about this,
link |
01:35:19.000
it supports this idea that the speech circuit
link |
01:35:21.960
in the separate language module,
link |
01:35:23.640
I don't really think that there's a separation there.
link |
01:35:26.840
So with that knowledge, yes,
link |
01:35:29.040
in putting electrodes in the human brain
link |
01:35:31.320
and then translating those electrical signals
link |
01:35:33.400
to speech currents, yeah,
link |
01:35:35.400
we can start to tell what is that person thinking.
link |
01:35:38.240
Why, because we often think in terms of speech
link |
01:35:42.200
and without saying words.
link |
01:35:44.960
And that's a scary thought.
link |
01:35:46.640
And now imagine if you can now translate those
link |
01:35:49.760
into a signal that transmits something wirelessly
link |
01:35:52.680
and someone from some distant part of the planet
link |
01:35:55.640
is hearing your speech from a wireless signal
link |
01:35:58.680
without you speaking.
link |
01:36:00.560
So probably that won't be done in an ethical way,
link |
01:36:04.800
who knows, but I mean,
link |
01:36:07.080
the ethics of doing that probably might not happen,
link |
01:36:10.280
but who knows, we have these songbirds,
link |
01:36:13.280
we apply the same technique to them,
link |
01:36:15.000
we can start to hear what they're singing
link |
01:36:16.440
in their dreams or whatever,
link |
01:36:18.480
even though they don't produce sound.
link |
01:36:19.840
So we can find out by testing on them.
link |
01:36:22.360
It's coming, one way or another, it's coming.
link |
01:36:26.160
For those listening who are interested
link |
01:36:28.200
in getting better at speaking and understanding languages,
link |
01:36:32.520
are there any tools that you recommend?
link |
01:36:34.720
And here again, I realize you're not a speech therapist,
link |
01:36:37.880
but here I'm not thinking about ameliorating
link |
01:36:39.760
any kind of speech deficiency.
link |
01:36:42.240
I'm thinking, for instance,
link |
01:36:44.080
do you recommend that people read different types of writing?
link |
01:36:49.480
Would you recommend that people learn how to dance
link |
01:36:51.400
in order to become better at expressing themselves verbally?
link |
01:36:54.360
And feel free to have some degrees of freedom
link |
01:36:59.520
in this answer.
link |
01:37:00.800
These are obviously not peer-reviewed studies
link |
01:37:03.640
that we're referring to, although there may be,
link |
01:37:06.640
but I'm struck by the number of things
link |
01:37:09.560
that you do exceedingly well,
link |
01:37:10.960
and I can't help but ask, well, the singing,
link |
01:37:15.600
which I realize it may,
link |
01:37:17.200
your brother didn't pay me to say this,
link |
01:37:18.400
may not be quite as good as your brother's yet,
link |
01:37:20.920
but you'll surpass him, I'm guessing,
link |
01:37:23.400
at some point in getting that.
link |
01:37:24.560
Getting there.
link |
01:37:25.400
Exactly, there you go.
link |
01:37:29.200
You know, should kids learn how to dance
link |
01:37:31.760
and read hard books and simple books?
link |
01:37:35.480
What do you recommend?
link |
01:37:36.320
Should adults learn how to do that?
link |
01:37:37.600
Everyone wants to know how to keep their brain
link |
01:37:39.560
working better, so to speak,
link |
01:37:41.280
but also I think people want to be able to speak well,
link |
01:37:44.080
and people want to be able to understand well.
link |
01:37:46.200
Yeah, so what I've discovered personally, right,
link |
01:37:50.120
is that, so when I switched from pursuing a career
link |
01:37:55.160
in science from a career in dance,
link |
01:37:59.160
I thought one day I would stop dancing,
link |
01:38:02.120
but I haven't because I find it fulfilling for me,
link |
01:38:06.640
just as a life experience.
link |
01:38:08.680
So ever since I started college,
link |
01:38:11.600
my late teens and early 20s,
link |
01:38:14.880
I kept dancing even till this day,
link |
01:38:17.880
and there have been periods of time
link |
01:38:19.040
like during the pandemic,
link |
01:38:20.560
where I slowed down on dancing and so forth.
link |
01:38:24.000
And when you do that, you realize,
link |
01:38:25.760
okay, there are parts of your body
link |
01:38:27.360
where your muscle tone decreases a little bit
link |
01:38:29.400
and somewhat, or you could start to gain weight.
link |
01:38:32.200
I somehow don't gain weight that easily,
link |
01:38:33.920
and I think it's related to my dance,
link |
01:38:35.440
if that's meaningful to your audience.
link |
01:38:38.520
But what I found is, in science,
link |
01:38:42.680
we like to think of a separation between movement
link |
01:38:45.600
and action and cognition.
link |
01:38:47.880
And there is a separation between perception
link |
01:38:50.200
and production, cognition being perception,
link |
01:38:53.160
production being movement, right?
link |
01:38:55.440
But if the speech pathways is next to the movement pathways,
link |
01:38:59.400
what I discover is by dancing, it is helping me think.
link |
01:39:04.560
It is helping keeping my brain fresh.
link |
01:39:06.800
It's not just moving my muscles.
link |
01:39:08.880
I'm moving or using the circuitry in my brain
link |
01:39:12.640
to control a whole big body.
link |
01:39:16.040
You need a lot of brain tissue to do that.
link |
01:39:18.440
And so I argue, if you wanna stay cognitively intact
link |
01:39:23.280
into your old age, you better be moving.
link |
01:39:26.240
And you better be doing it consistently,
link |
01:39:27.960
whether it's dancing, walking, running,
link |
01:39:30.720
and also practicing speech, oratory speech and so forth,
link |
01:39:35.520
or singing, is controlling the brain circuits
link |
01:39:38.160
that are moving your facial musculature.
link |
01:39:40.080
And it's gonna keep your cognitive circuits also in tune.
link |
01:39:44.200
And I'm convinced of that from my own personal experience.
link |
01:39:48.000
For me, long, slow runs are a wonderful way
link |
01:39:52.120
to kind of loosen the joints for long podcasts,
link |
01:39:56.320
especially the solo podcasts,
link |
01:39:57.680
which can take many hours to record.
link |
01:39:59.680
And without those long, slow runs,
link |
01:40:02.840
at least the day before or even the morning of,
link |
01:40:05.400
I don't think I could do it, at least not as well.
link |
01:40:07.760
All right, well, you're experiencing something similar.
link |
01:40:10.320
So that's an N of two.
link |
01:40:11.520
Yeah, N of two.
link |
01:40:13.360
I'm tempted to learn how to dance
link |
01:40:15.840
because there are a lot of reasons to learn how to dance.
link |
01:40:18.680
People can use their imagination.
link |
01:40:21.160
I definitely wanna get the opportunity
link |
01:40:23.760
to talk about some of the newer work
link |
01:40:26.000
that you're into right now about genomes of animals.
link |
01:40:31.000
As you perhaps can tell
link |
01:40:32.520
from my quite authentic facial expressions,
link |
01:40:35.200
I adore the animal kingdom.
link |
01:40:38.040
I just find it amazing.
link |
01:40:39.240
And it's the reason I went into neurobiology, in part.
link |
01:40:42.000
So many animals, so many different patterns of movement,
link |
01:40:45.400
so many body plans, so many specializations.
link |
01:40:49.400
What is the value of learning the genomes
link |
01:40:51.960
of all these animals?
link |
01:40:54.280
I can think of conservation-based schemes
link |
01:40:58.760
of trying to preserve these precious critters,
link |
01:41:02.080
but what are you doing with the genomes of these animals?
link |
01:41:04.160
What do you wanna understand about their brain circuits?
link |
01:41:06.520
And how does this relate to some of the discussion
link |
01:41:08.400
we've been having up until now?
link |
01:41:10.120
I've gotten very heavily involved in genomes,
link |
01:41:14.480
not just to get at an individual gene
link |
01:41:17.040
involved in the trait of interest, like spoken language,
link |
01:41:21.560
but I realize that nature has done
link |
01:41:25.840
natural experiments for us.
link |
01:41:28.680
With all these species out there with these various traits,
link |
01:41:31.680
and the one that I'm studying, like vocal learning,
link |
01:41:33.920
has evolved multiple times among the animal kingdom.
link |
01:41:36.560
Even if it's rare, it's multiple times.
link |
01:41:39.600
And the similar genetic changes occurred in those species.
link |
01:41:45.920
But to find out what those genetic changes
link |
01:41:48.560
that are associated with the trait of interest,
link |
01:41:50.760
and not some other trait like flying in birds
link |
01:41:53.560
as opposed to singing,
link |
01:41:56.680
you have to do what's called comparative genomics,
link |
01:41:59.040
even in the context of studying the brain.
link |
01:42:01.120
And you need their genomes to compare the genomes
link |
01:42:04.360
and do like a GWAS, a genome-wide association study,
link |
01:42:07.400
not just within a species like humans,
link |
01:42:09.440
but across species.
link |
01:42:10.760
And so you need good genomes to do that.
link |
01:42:13.680
Plus, I've discovered I'm also interested
link |
01:42:16.400
in evolution and origins.
link |
01:42:18.040
How did these species come about a similar trait
link |
01:42:22.160
in the last 300 million years or 60 million years,
link |
01:42:26.120
depending on who you're talking about?
link |
01:42:28.160
And you need a good phylogenetic tree to do that.
link |
01:42:31.080
And to get a good phylogenetic tree,
link |
01:42:32.800
you also need their genomes.
link |
01:42:34.800
And so because of this,
link |
01:42:36.120
I got involved in large-scale consortiums
link |
01:42:38.800
and produced genomes of many different species,
link |
01:42:41.960
including my vocal learners and their closest relatives
link |
01:42:45.240
that I'm fans of.
link |
01:42:47.560
But I couldn't convince the funding agencies
link |
01:42:49.360
to give me the money to do that just for my own project.
link |
01:42:52.760
But when you get a whole bunch of people together
link |
01:42:55.480
who wanna study various traits,
link |
01:42:58.120
heart disease or loss and gain of flight and so forth,
link |
01:43:03.680
suddenly we all need lots of genomes to do this.
link |
01:43:07.000
And so now that got me into a project
link |
01:43:09.600
to lead something called the Vertebrate Genomes Project
link |
01:43:12.600
to eventually sequence all 70,000 species on the planet.
link |
01:43:16.640
And Earth Biogenome Project, all eukaryotic species,
link |
01:43:20.680
all 2 million of them.
link |
01:43:23.080
And to no longer be in a situation
link |
01:43:26.720
where I wish I had this genome,
link |
01:43:28.880
now we have the genetic code of all life on the planet,
link |
01:43:32.200
create a database of all their traits
link |
01:43:34.680
and find the genetic association with everything out there
link |
01:43:38.920
that makes a difference from one species to another.
link |
01:43:42.400
One more piece of the equation to add to this story
link |
01:43:47.360
is what I didn't realize as a neuroscientist
link |
01:43:50.840
were that these genomes are not only incomplete,
link |
01:43:55.120
but they have lots of errors in them.
link |
01:43:58.200
False gene duplications where mother and father chromosomes
link |
01:44:01.760
were so different from each other
link |
01:44:03.880
that the genome algorithm, assembly algorithms,
link |
01:44:06.680
treated them as two different genes
link |
01:44:08.280
in this part of the chromosome.
link |
01:44:10.480
So there are a lot of these false duplicated genes
link |
01:44:12.840
that people were thought were real, but were not,
link |
01:44:16.120
or missing parts of the genome
link |
01:44:18.400
because the enzymes used to sequence the DNA
link |
01:44:21.680
couldn't get through this regulatory region
link |
01:44:23.800
that folded up on itself and made it hard to sequence.
link |
01:44:28.440
And so I end up in these consortiums
link |
01:44:31.680
pulling in the genome sequencing companies
link |
01:44:35.200
developing the technology to work with us
link |
01:44:38.360
to improve it further.
link |
01:44:39.680
And the computer science guys
link |
01:44:41.880
who then take that data and that technology
link |
01:44:44.200
and try to make the complete genomes
link |
01:44:45.920
and make the algorithms better
link |
01:44:47.920
to produce what we now just did recently,
link |
01:44:51.520
led by an effort by Adam Philippi,
link |
01:44:53.400
is the first human telomere to telomere genome
link |
01:44:56.160
with no errors, all complete, no missing sequence.
link |
01:45:00.400
And now we're trying to do the same thing
link |
01:45:02.040
with vertebrates and other species.
link |
01:45:04.440
Actually, we improved that before we got
link |
01:45:06.560
to what we call telomere to telomere,
link |
01:45:08.680
from one end of the chromosome to another.
link |
01:45:10.840
And what we're discovering is in this dark matter
link |
01:45:14.760
of the genome that was missing before,
link |
01:45:17.280
turns out to be some regulatory regions
link |
01:45:20.160
that are specialized in vocal learning species
link |
01:45:22.920
and we think are involved in developing speech circuits.
link |
01:45:26.280
Incredible, so much to learn and that we're going to learn
link |
01:45:30.720
from this information.
link |
01:45:32.120
Early on in these genome projects and connectome projects,
link |
01:45:35.280
I confess I was a little bit cynical.
link |
01:45:37.040
This would be about 10, 15 years ago.
link |
01:45:38.560
I thought, okay, necessary, but not sufficient for anything.
link |
01:45:42.640
We need it, but it's not clear what's going to happen.
link |
01:45:44.600
But you just gave a very clear example
link |
01:45:46.240
of what we stand to learn from this kind of information.
link |
01:45:49.640
And I know from the conservation side,
link |
01:45:52.600
there's a huge interest in this
link |
01:45:53.800
because even though we would prefer
link |
01:45:55.440
to keep all these species alive rather than clone them,
link |
01:45:58.840
these sorts of projects do offer the possibility
link |
01:46:01.360
of potentially recreating species that were lost
link |
01:46:04.560
due to our own ignorance or missteps or what have you.
link |
01:46:09.440
Yes, and along those lines,
link |
01:46:13.520
because we got involved in genomics,
link |
01:46:16.160
some of the first species that we start working on
link |
01:46:19.400
are critically endangered species.
link |
01:46:21.560
And I'm doing that not only for perspectives
link |
01:46:26.560
to understand their brains
link |
01:46:27.560
and the genes involved in their brain function,
link |
01:46:29.440
but I feel like it's a moral duty.
link |
01:46:31.880
So the fact that now I've become more involved
link |
01:46:34.640
in genome biology and have helped develop these tools
link |
01:46:37.720
for more complete genomes,
link |
01:46:39.080
let's capture their genetic code now before they're gone.
link |
01:46:43.920
And could we use that information to resurrect the species
link |
01:46:48.000
at some future time, if not in my lifetime,
link |
01:46:51.040
in some time in the future and generations ahead of us?
link |
01:46:54.880
And so in anticipation of that,
link |
01:46:59.600
we created a database we call the Genome Arc,
link |
01:47:03.120
and no pun intended, like NOAA's arc,
link |
01:47:06.000
meant to store the genetic code
link |
01:47:08.400
as complete genome assemblies as possible
link |
01:47:10.920
for all species on the planet to be used for basic science,
link |
01:47:14.720
but also some point in the future.
link |
01:47:17.360
And because of that,
link |
01:47:19.440
funding agencies or private foundations
link |
01:47:21.720
that are interested in conservation
link |
01:47:23.480
have been reaching out to me now, a neuroscientist,
link |
01:47:26.680
to help them out in producing high quality genome data
link |
01:47:30.400
of endangered species that they can use,
link |
01:47:32.440
like Revive and Restore,
link |
01:47:34.200
who want to resurrect the passenger pigeon,
link |
01:47:36.560
or Colossal, who wants to resurrect the wooly mammoth.
link |
01:47:39.800
And so we're producing high quality genomes for these groups
link |
01:47:43.040
for their conservation projects.
link |
01:47:44.720
What a terrific and important initiative.
link |
01:47:47.280
And I think for those listening today,
link |
01:47:49.160
they now certainly understand the value
link |
01:47:52.120
of deeply understanding the brain structures
link |
01:47:56.520
and genomes of different species,
link |
01:47:58.440
because I confess,
link |
01:48:00.360
even though I knew a bit of the songbird literature,
link |
01:48:02.840
and I certainly understand
link |
01:48:03.920
that humans have speech and language,
link |
01:48:05.480
I had no idea that there was so much convergence
link |
01:48:08.080
of function, structure, and genomes.
link |
01:48:10.280
And to me, I feel a lot more like an ape
link |
01:48:14.120
than I do a songbird.
link |
01:48:15.760
And yet here we are with the understanding
link |
01:48:18.560
that there's a lot more similarity
link |
01:48:20.440
between songbirds and humans
link |
01:48:22.680
than I certainly ever thought before.
link |
01:48:24.360
Yeah, something very close to home for us humans,
link |
01:48:27.400
I can give you an example of, is evolution of skin color.
link |
01:48:32.080
In skin color, we use it, unfortunately,
link |
01:48:35.160
for racism and so forth.
link |
01:48:37.200
We use it also for good things,
link |
01:48:38.640
to let in more light or let out less light,
link |
01:48:41.360
depending on the part of the planet
link |
01:48:43.720
our population evolved in.
link |
01:48:45.360
And most people think dark-skinned people
link |
01:48:47.640
all evolved from the same dark-skinned person,
link |
01:48:50.080
and light-skinned people
link |
01:48:51.280
all evolved from the same light-skinned person,
link |
01:48:52.840
but that's not the case.
link |
01:48:54.520
Dark skin and light skin amongst humans
link |
01:48:57.520
has evolved independently multiple times,
link |
01:49:00.720
like in the Pacific Islands versus Africa.
link |
01:49:03.720
And it's just depending on the angle of light
link |
01:49:07.160
hitting the Earth,
link |
01:49:08.520
as to whether you need more protection from the sun
link |
01:49:10.720
or less protection,
link |
01:49:12.800
that's also associated with vitamin D synthesis in the skin.
link |
01:49:16.800
And so, and each time
link |
01:49:22.080
where a darker or lighter skin evolved independently,
link |
01:49:26.200
it hit the same gene.
link |
01:49:27.600
You know, the melatonin receptors, that's right, yes, yeah.
link |
01:49:33.840
Genes that are involved in melanin formation.
link |
01:49:37.160
And so, those genes evolved some of the same mutations,
link |
01:49:41.080
even in different species.
link |
01:49:42.680
It's not just humans.
link |
01:49:44.360
In equatorial regions, there are darker-skinned animals
link |
01:49:48.280
than going away from the equator.
link |
01:49:50.600
All right, I think of arctic foxes and things like that.
link |
01:49:52.240
Yes, that's right, that's right.
link |
01:49:53.240
Polar bears, you know.
link |
01:49:54.720
And so, some of the same genes are used
link |
01:50:00.280
in an evolutionary perspective to evolve in a similar way
link |
01:50:03.200
within and across species.
link |
01:50:05.160
Incredible.
link |
01:50:06.200
And that's the same thing happening in the brain too.
link |
01:50:08.360
Language is no exception.
link |
01:50:10.040
Well, I have to say, as somebody who is a, you know,
link |
01:50:12.760
career neuroscientist, but as I mentioned several times now,
link |
01:50:15.880
who also adores the animal kingdom,
link |
01:50:18.320
but is also obsessed with speech and language
link |
01:50:22.240
and at a distance, not as a practitioner of music and dance,
link |
01:50:28.840
this has been an incredible conversation
link |
01:50:31.360
and opportunity for me to learn.
link |
01:50:33.480
I know I speak for a tremendous number of people,
link |
01:50:35.600
and I just really want to say thank you
link |
01:50:37.400
for joining us today.
link |
01:50:38.880
You are incredibly busy.
link |
01:50:40.080
It's clear from your description of your science
link |
01:50:42.600
and your knowledge base that you are involved
link |
01:50:44.240
in a huge number of things, very busy.
link |
01:50:47.360
So thank you for taking the time to speak to all of us.
link |
01:50:50.320
Thank you for the work that you're doing,
link |
01:50:52.120
both on speech and language,
link |
01:50:53.680
but also this important work on genomes
link |
01:50:55.800
and conservation of endangered species and far more.
link |
01:51:00.760
And I have to say, if you would agree to come back
link |
01:51:03.400
and speak to us again sometime,
link |
01:51:05.040
I'm certain that if we were to sit down
link |
01:51:06.560
even six months or a year from now,
link |
01:51:08.240
there's going to be a lot more to come.
link |
01:51:09.400
Yeah, we have some things cooking.
link |
01:51:10.760
And thank you for inviting me here
link |
01:51:13.400
to get the word out to the community
link |
01:51:16.440
of what's going on in the science world.
link |
01:51:18.440
Well, we're honored and very grateful to you, Eric.
link |
01:51:20.680
Thank you.
link |
01:51:21.520
You're welcome.
link |
01:51:22.400
Thank you for joining me today
link |
01:51:23.480
for my discussion with Dr. Eric Jarvis.
link |
01:51:25.680
If you'd like to learn more about his laboratory's work,
link |
01:51:28.360
you can go to Jarvis Lab,
link |
01:51:30.160
spelled J-A-R-V-I-S, lab, all one word, jarvislab.net,
link |
01:51:35.000
and there you can learn about all the various studies
link |
01:51:37.120
taking place in his laboratory,
link |
01:51:38.940
as well as some of the larger overarching themes
link |
01:51:41.080
that are driving those studies,
link |
01:51:42.720
including studies on human genomics and animal genomics
link |
01:51:45.980
that surely are going to lead
link |
01:51:47.680
to the next stage discoveries of how we learn
link |
01:51:51.200
and think about and indeed use language.
link |
01:51:53.920
If you're learning from and are enjoying this podcast,
link |
01:51:56.320
please subscribe to our YouTube channel.
link |
01:51:58.320
That's a simple, zero-cost way to support us.
link |
01:52:00.740
Please also subscribe to the podcast on Spotify and Apple.
link |
01:52:03.960
And on both Spotify and Apple,
link |
01:52:05.880
you have the opportunity to leave us up to a five-star review.
link |
01:52:09.160
If you have questions or comments or suggestions
link |
01:52:11.180
about topics you'd like us to cover
link |
01:52:12.680
or guests you'd like us to interview
link |
01:52:13.900
on the Huberman Lab Podcast,
link |
01:52:15.540
please put those in the comment section on YouTube.
link |
01:52:18.240
We do read all those comments and we do take them to heart.
link |
01:52:21.180
Please also check out the sponsors mentioned
link |
01:52:22.800
at the beginning of today's podcast.
link |
01:52:24.660
And check out Momentous Supplements,
link |
01:52:26.540
our new partners in the supplement space,
link |
01:52:28.200
and check out Athletic Greens.
link |
01:52:30.220
That's the best way to support this podcast.
link |
01:52:32.520
If you're not already following us on social media,
link |
01:52:34.760
please do so.
link |
01:52:36.060
We are Huberman Lab on Twitter
link |
01:52:37.800
and we are also Huberman Lab on Instagram.
link |
01:52:39.860
And both places I cover science and science-related tools,
link |
01:52:43.200
some of which overlap with the content
link |
01:52:44.760
of the Huberman Lab Podcast,
link |
01:52:45.920
but much of which is unique from the content
link |
01:52:48.160
covered on the Huberman Lab Podcast.
link |
01:52:49.680
Again, that's Huberman Lab on Instagram
link |
01:52:51.400
and Huberman Lab on Twitter.
link |
01:52:53.040
Please also check out our Neural Network monthly newsletter.
link |
01:52:55.960
This is a newsletter that has summaries of podcast episodes.
link |
01:52:59.440
It also includes a lot of actionable protocols.
link |
01:53:01.720
It's very easy to sign up for the newsletter.
link |
01:53:03.780
You go to HubermanLab.com, click on the menu,
link |
01:53:05.940
go to newsletter, you supply your email,
link |
01:53:08.000
but we do not share your email with anybody.
link |
01:53:10.000
We have a very clear and rigorous privacy policy,
link |
01:53:12.900
which is we do not share your email with anybody.
link |
01:53:15.120
And the newsletter comes out once a month
link |
01:53:17.640
and it is completely zero cost.
link |
01:53:19.160
Again, just go to HubermanLab.com
link |
01:53:21.200
and go to the Neural Network newsletter.
link |
01:53:23.660
I'd also like to point out that the Huberman Lab Podcast
link |
01:53:25.960
has a clips channel.
link |
01:53:27.160
So these are brief clips,
link |
01:53:29.480
anywhere from three to 10 minutes
link |
01:53:31.520
that encompass single concepts
link |
01:53:33.420
and actionable protocols related to sleep, to focus,
link |
01:53:37.000
interviews with various guests.
link |
01:53:38.280
We talk about things like caffeine,
link |
01:53:39.640
when to drink caffeine relative to sleep, alcohol,
link |
01:53:42.760
when and how and if anyone should ingest it
link |
01:53:44.720
relative to sleep, dopamine, serotonin, mental health,
link |
01:53:48.400
physical health, and on and on,
link |
01:53:50.000
all the things that relate to the topics
link |
01:53:51.960
most of interest to you.
link |
01:53:53.300
You can find that easily by going to YouTube,
link |
01:53:55.960
look for Huberman Lab clips in the search area,
link |
01:53:58.880
and it will take you there, subscribe,
link |
01:54:00.440
and we are constantly updating those with new clips.
link |
01:54:02.780
This is especially useful, I believe,
link |
01:54:04.320
for people that have missed some of the earlier episodes
link |
01:54:06.340
or you're still working through the back catalog
link |
01:54:07.960
of Huberman Lab Podcasts,
link |
01:54:09.040
which admittedly can be rather long.
link |
01:54:11.160
And last, but certainly not least,
link |
01:54:13.460
thank you for your interest in science.
link |
01:54:15.260
I'll see you in the next one.